2013
DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2013.831869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Universal vaccination with RV5 in Japan is projected to have a substantial public health impact and may be cost-effective from both the payer and societal perspectives if parental disutilities are included in the cost-effectiveness ratios.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20,21 The significant difference between our model and those of the previous studies is the incorporation of rotavirus-related encephalitis/encephalopathy, and sequelae in the model, which were not present in the previous ones. These might be considerably influential factors, which have contributed to favorable ICERs compared with those of the 2 previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 37%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…20,21 The significant difference between our model and those of the previous studies is the incorporation of rotavirus-related encephalitis/encephalopathy, and sequelae in the model, which were not present in the previous ones. These might be considerably influential factors, which have contributed to favorable ICERs compared with those of the 2 previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 37%
“…Over the last few years, several studies evaluated the cost-effectiveness of routine infant rotavirus vaccination around the world and reported varying results even studies from the same country; 20,21,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] among them, 2 are from Japan. 20,21 The significant difference between our model and those of the previous studies is the incorporation of rotavirus-related encephalitis/encephalopathy, and sequelae in the model, which were not present in the previous ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations