2019
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effectiveness and National Effects of Initiating Colorectal Cancer Screening for Average-Risk Persons at Age 45 Years Instead of 50 Years

Abstract: BACKGROUND & AIMS: The American Cancer Society has recommended initiating colorectal cancer (CRC) screening at age 45 years instead of 50 years. We estimated the cost effectiveness and national effects of adopting this recommendation. METHODS: We compared screening strategies and alternative resource allocations in a validated Markov model. We based national projections on screening participation rates by age and census data. RESULTS: Screening colonoscopy initiation at age 45 years instead of 50 years in 1000… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
143
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
143
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence shows that for women of all ages at average risk, screening is linked to an approximate 20% reduction in breast cancer mortality [ 14 ]. Data analysis further indicates that 3 times the deaths resulting from colorectal cancer would be avoided with one third of current costs if colorectal cancer screening rates in people aged 50-70 years improved to 80% [ 15 ]. For the genetically predisposed individual, the benefit of prescribed cancer screening has an even greater impact [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence shows that for women of all ages at average risk, screening is linked to an approximate 20% reduction in breast cancer mortality [ 14 ]. Data analysis further indicates that 3 times the deaths resulting from colorectal cancer would be avoided with one third of current costs if colorectal cancer screening rates in people aged 50-70 years improved to 80% [ 15 ]. For the genetically predisposed individual, the benefit of prescribed cancer screening has an even greater impact [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In China, there was an increase of over 376 300 cases of CRC and a total of 191 000 deaths during 2015 3 . Environmental and lifestyle changes, including an altered diet, lack of appropriate physical activity, circadian disruption, and increase in alcohol consumption, have enormously aggravated the burden of CRC 4 . In the past several years, the incidence and mortality of CRC increased rapidly and the onset age was much younger 5,6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Although the model predicts benefits in earlier detection of CRC, a number of unintended consequences could potentially follow, 6 primary of which is the diversion of resources away from higher risk populations for whom the relative benefit of screening is substantially greater. 33 Moreover, the agreement or disagreement of models is not a straightforward measure of the strength or weakness of evidence. It is difficult to know whether differences in predictions are due to differences in model design or model inputs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%