2013
DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2013.35347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness analysis review of exemestane in the treatment of primary and advanced breast cancer

Abstract: IntroductionExemestane was approved in 2005 for adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. In this study, we aimed to assess whether it is cost-effective in comparison to available alternatives.Material and methodsTo evaluate the efficacy of exemestane, a systematic review was conducted by searching electronic databases. The outcomes of interest were “clinical benefit”, “overall response” and “disease-free survival rate”. To evaluate the cost of treatments, costs of both domestic generic and imported brand medicines… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Breast cancer is currently treated with conservative surgery, adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy, as appropriate. However, there is an elevated rate of patients who relapse with metastatic disease [ 10 12 ]. Therefore, we need to develop new treatments aimed at being more effective and selective, and that contribute to improving the prognosis and survival of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast cancer is currently treated with conservative surgery, adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy, as appropriate. However, there is an elevated rate of patients who relapse with metastatic disease [ 10 12 ]. Therefore, we need to develop new treatments aimed at being more effective and selective, and that contribute to improving the prognosis and survival of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Exemestane (EXE), as illustrated in Figure 1a, is an oral aromatase inhibitor that was approved in 1999 by the USFDA for the treatment of estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. 4 However, it is a BCS class IV drug and thus exhibits high first-pass metabolism, low bioavailability, high lipophilicity, and poor solubility, which subsequently results in limited clinical therapeutic efficacy. 5 Moreover, it has been reported to cause a loss in bone density at an accelerated rate, resulting in its demineralization and subsequently leading to fractures and osteoporosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast cancer is known as the most common cancer among women and all ages are susceptible in both developed and developing countries, and also is the most common malignancy in women [2][3][4]. However, most of the mortalities caused by breast cancer (about 88%) occur in developing countries [5]. This, can be justified with the lower levels of awareness and education in such countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk factors are genetic and epigenetic factors [18], familial history, age, the ages of menopause and menarche, the age of the first pregnancy, geographical and anthropological variations, previous benign disease, radiation, hormone replacement therapies, the oral contraceptives and life style [19]. The treatment of breast cancer could be through hormone-replacement therapy [20], exemestane (in advanced cases, in the early stage of estrogen receptor positive patients, or in postmenopausal women who have already been treated with tamoxifen for 2-3 years) [5], the platinum compounds affecting cell cycle [21], radiation therapy [22] or immunoradiotherapy as a technic based on monoclonal antibodies [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%