Cost-effective diagnostic cardiovascular imaging: when does it provide good value for the money?

Abstract

To summarize the results of all original cost-utility analyses (CUAs) in diagnostic cardiovascular imaging (CVI) and characterize those technologies by estimates of their cost-effectiveness. We systematically searched the literature for original CVI CUAs published between 2000 and 2008. Studies were classified according to several variables including anatomy of interest (e.g. cerebrovascular, aorta, peripheral) and imaging modality under study (e.g. angiography, ultrasound). The results of each study, expressed as cost of the intervention to number of qualityadjusted life years saved ratio (cost/QALY) were additionally classified as favorable or not using $20,000, $50,000, and $100,000 per QALY thresholds. The distribution of results was assessed with Chi Square or Fisher exact test, as indicated. Sixty-nine percent of all cardiovascular imaging CUAs were published between 2000 and 2008. Thirty-two studies reporting 82 cost/QALY ratios were included in the final sample. The most common vascular areas studied were cerebrovascular (n = 9) and cardiac (n = 8). Sixty-six percent (21/32) of studies focused on sonography, followed by conventional angiography and CT (25%, n = 8, each). Twenty-nine (35.4%), 42 (51.2%), and 53 (64.6%) ratios were favorable at WTP $20,000/QALY, $50,000/QALY, and $100,000/QALY, © Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2010Correspondence to: Hansel J. Otero, hotero@tuftsmedicalcenter.org. NIH Public Access

Cost-Utility Analyses of Diagnostic Laboratory Tests: A Systematic Review

“…However, the scale has been analyzed and reported on in several previous publications, which found that the quality score was correlated with factors such as the methodology used to conduct and report results of sensitivity analyses, as well as the quality and experience of journals reporting results from economic evaluations [18,21,22,26,46]. We did not judge the appropriateness of the comparator used in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.…”

“…CUA has been applied to a wide variety of health interventions including pharmaceuticals [18], surgical procedures [19,20], and diagnostic imaging [21,22] and is recommended by many experts in health economics and outcomes research. One previous study reviewed various types of published cost-effectiveness analyses involving all kinds of diagnostic strategies [23].…”

Mathematical and Ultrasonographic Model of the Left Ventricle: in Vitro Studies

“…Thus, it enables the sooner and better therapy with relatively low financial resources (Picano, 2005;Otero et al, 2010). Moreover, it is of great scientific and educational value (Maecken et al, 2011;Evangelista et al, 2008).…”

Population based ultrasonographic screening of abdominal aortic aneurysms

“…This often results in long term, potentially life-long surveillance, with not only direct costs of imaging but also potential opportunity costs of foregoing another preventive measure in health systems with scarce resources. However, similar to other imaging interventions, US has been shown to be overall highly cost-effective than no imaging or observation alone [15]. There are conflicting results on quality of life, anxiety and depression associated with long-term screening [1], with some studies showing mild transient reduction of quality of life [14].…”