2010
DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.5.317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost and Utilization of Behavioral Health Medications Associated with Rescission of an Exemption for Prior Authorization for Severe and Persistent Mental Illness in the Vermont Medicaid Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, we did not have access to diagnostic information, making us unable to determine to what extent utilization of antipsychotic medications varied by child clinical status. Similar to other studies of the impact of prior authorization policies in adults (Cunningham 2005;Soumerai et al 2008;Adams et al 2009;Abouzaid et al 2010;Simeone et al 2010;Walthour et al 2010;Vogt et al 2011), we do not have any way to determine the burden on physicians of the prior authorization policies. Physician burden would be important to measure in future studies, as it might explain the variability in prior authorization policy impacts observed in different studies and/or different states.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, we did not have access to diagnostic information, making us unable to determine to what extent utilization of antipsychotic medications varied by child clinical status. Similar to other studies of the impact of prior authorization policies in adults (Cunningham 2005;Soumerai et al 2008;Adams et al 2009;Abouzaid et al 2010;Simeone et al 2010;Walthour et al 2010;Vogt et al 2011), we do not have any way to determine the burden on physicians of the prior authorization policies. Physician burden would be important to measure in future studies, as it might explain the variability in prior authorization policy impacts observed in different studies and/or different states.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Among 0-5-year-olds there was no significant impact of the antipsychotic prior authorization policy, with the rate of antipsychotic medication use increasing after the prior authorization policy by 0.32%, only slightly less than the 0.36% increase in the use of antidepressants in 0-5-year-olds in the state in the same time frame. Although no comparable data from studies of Medicaid-enrolled children are available, effects of comparable magnitude have been observed in similar studies of adults (Simeone et al 2010;Vogt et al 2011). Several factors could contribute to this modest policy effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These programs require clinicians to use medications considered preferred before using other medications within the same class, thereby shaping prescribing practices toward use of less expensive, but therapeutically similar or equivalent, agents. These programs are designed to contain costs while maintaining access to many or all medications (7)…”
Section: Strategies To Improve Quality Of Prescribingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Furthermore, in the Vermont Medicaid program, rescission of a PA exemption for new users of antipsychotics, antidepressants, and anxiolytics/sedatives was not followed by decreased utilization of medications on the PA list, and mental health-related hospitalizations declined following removal of the PA exemption. 32 As none of the studies that found increased treatment discontinuities examined other medical utilization or clinical outcomes, it is unclear whether the potentially inconsistent findings are due to differences in program design or a lack of short-term link between decreased medication use and use of other medical services. If the latter, are the observed treatment discontinuities leading to negative effects on important clinical outcomes that do not necessarily manifest in claims-based measures of utilization?…”
Section: ■■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%