2017
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corticosteroids in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: impact on the motor function measure sensitivity to change and implications for clinical trials

Abstract: Corticosteroids have a quantitative impact on muscle strength 6 to 24 months after starting treatment. Motor function measure is a valid outcome measure in Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients under corticosteroid treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also investigated possible relationships between timed immersion mouth and nose expiration and age, motor and respiratory functions. Motor and respiratory functions deteriorated in MD patients in oneyear follow-up, as observed in previous studies [21,22]. However, timed immersion expiration did not deteriorate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…We also investigated possible relationships between timed immersion mouth and nose expiration and age, motor and respiratory functions. Motor and respiratory functions deteriorated in MD patients in oneyear follow-up, as observed in previous studies [21,22]. However, timed immersion expiration did not deteriorate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The reliability of the MFM has been examined in several studies. It is described as being sensitive to treatment response [32] and to disease progression even within as short a period as 3 months [33, 34]. The D1 domain of the MFM, assessing standing and transfer, was shown to be the most powerful parameter to detect clinical decline compared to D2 and D3 domains [35].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the D1 domain remains around 0% in patients who have lost ambulation it cannot be applied to monitor disease progression or treatment response in nonambulant patients. In contrast, the D2 and D3 domains are more suitable for nonambulant patients as these assess the retained upper limb functions [29, 32, 33]. The D2 domain in particular was shown to be informative, with a decrease of 9.4% per year in nonambulant patients [33].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability of the MFM has been examined in several studies. It is described to be sensitive to treatment response 32 , and to disease progression even within as short periods as 3 months [33][34] . The D1 domain of the MFM, assessing standing and transfer, was shown to be the most powerful parameter to detect clinical decline compared to D2 and D3 domains 35 .…”
Section: Change Of D1 Domain Of Motor Function Under Tamoxifen Comparmentioning
confidence: 99%