2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2020.108019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrosion and tribocorrosion behavior of W doped DLC coating in artificial seawater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Table 5, the adhesion results obtained in this study are higher than those reported in the references [26,27,66]. On the other hand, similar results of Lc2 were reported in reference [34], with ta-C and WC:C coatings, or in reference [67], showing Lc2 values up to 42 N to W-doped DLCs.…”
Section: Adhesion Testssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…As can be seen in Table 5, the adhesion results obtained in this study are higher than those reported in the references [26,27,66]. On the other hand, similar results of Lc2 were reported in reference [34], with ta-C and WC:C coatings, or in reference [67], showing Lc2 values up to 42 N to W-doped DLCs.…”
Section: Adhesion Testssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…It is clearly seen that COF of ceramic coatings presents an increase with increasing hardness. For traditional lubricating materials, DLC based coatings exhibit good tribocorrosion resistance with low coe cient of friction of 0.036 due to the combination of hardness and toughness [52,53]. However, in this work, superhard yet tough Ti-C-N coatings possess excellent seawater lubrication with ultra-low COF of 0.03.…”
Section: Tribocorrosion Resistancementioning
confidence: 77%
“…The presence of MoO 3 (≈908 cm −1 ) and WO 3 was attributed to the tribochemical products formed inside the wear track. By comparison, the D and G bands (≈1345 and ≈1579 cm −1 , respectively) of the carbon‐based materials [ 31,32 ] along with the MoO 3 peak are still visible in the contact area of the steel ball, suggesting that the transfer layer, which mainly contained amorphous carbon and Mo oxide, steadily formed on the contact area. The lack of WS 2 phase in the contact area can possibly be attributed to the poor adhesion between the mainly carbon‐containing transfer layer and the WS 2 phase in the contact area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%