2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10773-015-2706-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correspondence of F-Essence with Holographic and New Agegraphic Dark Energy Models

Abstract: In this work, we consider a non-flat universe filled with Fermionic field. First, we have considered the holographic dark energy and new agegraphic dark energy in the framework of F -essence cosmology and investigated the consequences for their coexistence. The correspondence of F -essence with the above types of dark energy models have been investigated. The natures of K and Y for these correspondence of F -essence with the above dark energies have been analyzed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Planck's observational data [12] about 68.3 percent of the total cosmic budget is occupied by Dark energy, while about 26.8 percent is filled with dark matter and about 4.9 percent is usual baryonic matter.There have been a prolonged attempt to reconcile the physical nature of dark energy. An overwhelming flood of dynamical dark energy models such as quintessence, tachyon [13], ghost [14], k-essence [15], fermionic field [16,17,18], phantom [19], Chaplygin gas [20], holographic dark energy (HDE) [21,22,23], new agegraphic dark energy (NADE) [24,25] and modified gravity models such as f(R) gravity [26,27], f(T) gravity [28,29,30], Hořava-Lifshitz gravity [31,32,33,34] have been proposed in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Planck's observational data [12] about 68.3 percent of the total cosmic budget is occupied by Dark energy, while about 26.8 percent is filled with dark matter and about 4.9 percent is usual baryonic matter.There have been a prolonged attempt to reconcile the physical nature of dark energy. An overwhelming flood of dynamical dark energy models such as quintessence, tachyon [13], ghost [14], k-essence [15], fermionic field [16,17,18], phantom [19], Chaplygin gas [20], holographic dark energy (HDE) [21,22,23], new agegraphic dark energy (NADE) [24,25] and modified gravity models such as f(R) gravity [26,27], f(T) gravity [28,29,30], Hořava-Lifshitz gravity [31,32,33,34] have been proposed in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%