2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations between cascade impactor analysis and laser diffraction techniques for the determination of the particle size of aerosolised powder formulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In such a system, a laser beam crosses the end of the metal throat of an impactor [105][106][107]. The entire assembly is a closed system that allows for a controlled airflow rate in the measurement zone.…”
Section: Particle Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In such a system, a laser beam crosses the end of the metal throat of an impactor [105][106][107]. The entire assembly is a closed system that allows for a controlled airflow rate in the measurement zone.…”
Section: Particle Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between classical and new laser diffraction systems is the particle dispersion capacity of the two methods. The compressed air values applied in the classical dry dispersion unit allow all of the agglomerates to break down, whereas the air flow generated in DPI systems is much lower and does not permit the deagglomeration of all particles [107]. Different correlations between geometric and aerodynamic size data have already been demonstrated.…”
Section: Particle Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is one of the only techniques which provides a particle size distribution expressed in terms of mass (rather than number) of particles in each size range [25][26][27]. This is the most relevant parameter for predicting particle transport [28], and health hazard [29].…”
Section: Cascade Impactormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many studies confirmed that the most profitable features of laser diffraction are time saving, reproducibility, automatic data recording, and automatic processing. Furthermore, the applicability of laser diffraction technique is evaluated as an alternative for cascade impactor analysis for the in vitro characterization of various types of medical aerosol generators (15,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). Some commonly used laser diffractometers are the Spraytec laser diffractometer (Malvern Instruments, UK) and the Sympatec HELOS laser diffraction analyzer (Sympatec GmbH, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany) (14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%