2019
DOI: 10.1111/imm.13036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of cell‐surface CD8 levels with function, phenotype and transcriptome of naive CD8 T cells

Abstract: We have previously demonstrated co-receptor level-associated functional heterogeneity in apparently homogeneous naive peripheral CD4 T cells, dependent on MHC-mediated tonic signals. Maturation pathways can differ between naive CD4 and naive CD8 cells, so we tested whether the latter showed similar co-receptor level-associated functional heterogeneity. We report that, when either polyclonal and T-cell receptor (TCR)-transgenic monoclonal peripheral naive CD8 T cells from young mice were separated into CD8 hi a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these approaches inevitably depend on the crosstalking between T cells and APCs, as cross-priming of T cells relies on surface markers of APCs 9,10 . Unfortunately, numerous endogenous factors including susceptibility, restricted migration, immune suppression, and metabolic constraints can influence the inherent function of APCs [11][12][13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these approaches inevitably depend on the crosstalking between T cells and APCs, as cross-priming of T cells relies on surface markers of APCs 9,10 . Unfortunately, numerous endogenous factors including susceptibility, restricted migration, immune suppression, and metabolic constraints can influence the inherent function of APCs [11][12][13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, these two molecules were also co-regulated, such that T cell activation responses were allowed to vary but only within biologically defined limits. Later investigations in naïve T cells expressing high versus low levels of surface CD8 corroborated these findings and demonstrated additional differences in gene expression including cell cycle and pro-apoptotic genes (137). Other experiments sorting naïve cells by glucose uptake capacity or markers of protein synthesis also revealed association with responsiveness to TCR stimulation (53).…”
Section: Origins Of Heterogeneity Among Naïve T Cellsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The CD8 coreceptor amplifies signals through the TCR ( van den Berg et al, 2007 ; Wooldridge et al, 2010 ). Following antigenic stimulation (e.g., by a virus-infected cell), CD8, along with the TCR, is downregulated from the cell surface, possibly to limit the strength or duration of signaling ( Park et al, 2007 ; Lachmann et al, 2012 ; Balyan et al, 2018 ). This suggests that the expansion of CD8 dim T cells may be a response to high and/or persistent antigen stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%