2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(03)00054-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between ultrasonic shear wave velocity and Poisson’s ratio for isotropic solid materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
40
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
8
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3], which indicates that the rate of change in V T avg is higher as compared to the rate of change in V L , for a given variation in the a-phase volume fraction. This finding is in accordance with the earlier reported observations by Kumar et al [23] that the shear wave velocity is more influenced by changes in various microstructural features as compared to the ultrasonic longitudinal wave velocity. This also indicates that Poisson's ratio, which is a function of the ratio of the ultrasonic longitudinal and shear wave velocities, can also be correlated with the volume fraction of the phases in the titanium alloy.…”
Section: B Ultrasonic Velocitiessupporting
confidence: 94%
“…[3], which indicates that the rate of change in V T avg is higher as compared to the rate of change in V L , for a given variation in the a-phase volume fraction. This finding is in accordance with the earlier reported observations by Kumar et al [23] that the shear wave velocity is more influenced by changes in various microstructural features as compared to the ultrasonic longitudinal wave velocity. This also indicates that Poisson's ratio, which is a function of the ratio of the ultrasonic longitudinal and shear wave velocities, can also be correlated with the volume fraction of the phases in the titanium alloy.…”
Section: B Ultrasonic Velocitiessupporting
confidence: 94%
“…For example, the ultrasonic longitudinal wave velocity and shear wave velocity in austenitic stainless steel are 5690 to 5800 m/s and 3150 to 3300 m/s, respectively, whereas they are 5900 to 6000 m/s and 3100 to 3300 m/s, respectively, for ferritic steel with martensitic structure. [25] The maximum in hardness coincides with the maximum in ultrasonic longitudinal wave velocity at 40 hours, whereas the shear wave velocity exhibits a maximum at 70 hours. The maximum in shear wave velocity at 70 hours shows that even though a sufficient amount of austenite is present, its effect on shear wave velocity is less and the influence of precipitation is seen up to 70 hours, indicating that precipitation of intermetallics continues even up to 70 hours of aging at 755 K. Figure 6 shows the variation in ultrasonic longitudinal and shear wave velocities with hardness.…”
Section: A Microstructural Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Poisson's ratio with ultrasonic velocities on precipitation of intermetallics has been reported earlier also. [25] As discussed earlier, the influence of precipitation of intermetallics and the reversion of austenite is different on ultrasonic longitudinal and shear wave velocities. This would lead to different correlations between ultrasonic velocities and Poisson's ratio due to precipitation of intermetallic phases and reversion of austenite; i.e., deviation from linearity is expected consequent to the initiation of reversion of austenite.…”
Section: A Microstructural Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The elastic moduli, including the Young's, shear and bulk moduli, and the Poisson's ratio, of isotropic solid materials may be calculated from measurements of the density and longitudinal and shear sound velocities by ultrasonic methods [17,102,111]: [110].…”
Section: Young's Bulk and Shear Modulimentioning
confidence: 99%