2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between anatomic foot and ankle movement measured with MRI and with a motion analysis system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared with our previous study, the sagittal forefoot dorsiflexion decreased throughout the entire barefoot trial but not enough to show clinical significance [20]. However, in our current study, there was no significant difference between the HAFO and barefoot trials.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When compared with our previous study, the sagittal forefoot dorsiflexion decreased throughout the entire barefoot trial but not enough to show clinical significance [20]. However, in our current study, there was no significant difference between the HAFO and barefoot trials.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…During the initial visit of our study, the use of the HAFO produced an increase in ankle dorsiflexion and a decrease in forefoot sagittal motion [20]. Romkes et al [23] also found an immediate improvement after HAFO use; there was a reduced ankle plantarflexion during the swing phase (–26.7° BF and 0.7° HAFO) and toe off (–17.1° BF and 2.7° HAFO) and increased step and stride length.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The system used square sensors (∼1.5 cm × 1.5 cm) placed on the foot to register movement, and all sensors were attached via a cord to a signal processing box. The marker configuration used was a 6SF model previously used to measure changes in foot motion in normal pediatric subjects . The external sensors were placed on the foot to track motions of the tibia, calcaneus, cuboid, navicular, 1st metatarsal, and hallux.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants used either HAFOs, SAFOs, or SMOs. A six segment foot model (6SF) was used to track ankle joint and foot segment movement …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most literature describing normal foot motion is limited by the small number of segments of the foot investigated, small sample size, or both. The most valid kinematic data requires direct measurement of bone motion [ 8 ] or imaging of individual bones [ 9 , 10 ]. However these inevitably suffer from a lack of generalisability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%