Corporate Psychopathy 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-27188-6_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Psychopathy: Entering the Paradox and Emerging Unscathed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, our chapter diverges somewhat from the scholarship on bad leadership that has grown since the nineteen seventies (Dixon 1976). Since then it has been explored mostly in accounts of "toxic leadership" and "corporate psychopathy" (Reed 2004;Walton 2007;Einarsen et al 2007;Pelletier 2010) and more latterly in general leadership studies (Kellerman 2004(Kellerman , 2012Schilling and Schyns 2014;Helms 2014;Brooks et al 2020;Swiatek 2020). The arguments in our chapter diverge by emphasizing how leadership discourse in general is guilty, rather than a particular type of leadership concept or the type of person or traits that are promoted within certain contexts.…”
Section: Richard Little and Jem Bendellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, our chapter diverges somewhat from the scholarship on bad leadership that has grown since the nineteen seventies (Dixon 1976). Since then it has been explored mostly in accounts of "toxic leadership" and "corporate psychopathy" (Reed 2004;Walton 2007;Einarsen et al 2007;Pelletier 2010) and more latterly in general leadership studies (Kellerman 2004(Kellerman , 2012Schilling and Schyns 2014;Helms 2014;Brooks et al 2020;Swiatek 2020). The arguments in our chapter diverge by emphasizing how leadership discourse in general is guilty, rather than a particular type of leadership concept or the type of person or traits that are promoted within certain contexts.…”
Section: Richard Little and Jem Bendellmentioning
confidence: 99%