2013
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CoRoT 101186644: A transiting low-mass dense M-dwarf on an eccentric 20.7-day period orbit around a late F-star

Abstract: We present the study of the CoRoT transiting planet candidate 101186644, also named LRc01_E1_4780. Analysis of the CoRoT lightcurve and the HARPS spectroscopic follow-up observations of this faint (m V = 16) candidate revealed an eclipsing binary composed of a late F-type primary (T eff = 6090 ± 200 K) and a low-mass, dense late M-dwarf secondary on an eccentric (e = 0.4) orbit with a period of ∼20.7 days. The M-dwarf has a mass of 0.096 ± 0.011 M , and a radius of 0.104 +0.026 −0.006 R , which possibly makes … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using different stellar models for the characterization of the primary star did not lead to significant changes in the mass-radius relation of either of the stars. (Ségransan et al 2003;Bouchy et al 2005;Pont et al 2005Pont et al , 2006Hebb et al 2006;Beatty et al 2007;Maxted et al 2007;Blake et al 2008;Fernandez et al 2009;Morales et al 2009;Vida et al 2009;Dimitrov & Kjurkchieva 2010;Parsons et al 2010Parsons et al , 2012Hartman et al 2011;Carter et al 2011;Irwin et al 2011;Pyrzas et al 2012;Nefs et al 2013;Tal-Or et al 2013;Gómez Maqueo Chew et al 2014;Zhou et al 2014) and spectroscopic characterized single low mass stars (gray triangles) (Mann et al 2015). The best fit to data from Mann et al (2015) is given by the green dashed line.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using different stellar models for the characterization of the primary star did not lead to significant changes in the mass-radius relation of either of the stars. (Ségransan et al 2003;Bouchy et al 2005;Pont et al 2005Pont et al , 2006Hebb et al 2006;Beatty et al 2007;Maxted et al 2007;Blake et al 2008;Fernandez et al 2009;Morales et al 2009;Vida et al 2009;Dimitrov & Kjurkchieva 2010;Parsons et al 2010Parsons et al , 2012Hartman et al 2011;Carter et al 2011;Irwin et al 2011;Pyrzas et al 2012;Nefs et al 2013;Tal-Or et al 2013;Gómez Maqueo Chew et al 2014;Zhou et al 2014) and spectroscopic characterized single low mass stars (gray triangles) (Mann et al 2015). The best fit to data from Mann et al (2015) is given by the green dashed line.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grey circles indicate the mass and radius of red dwarfs in other PCEB binaries (Parsons et al 2010b(Parsons et al , 2012b(Parsons et al ,c, 2016. Grey squares indicate the mass and radius of single red dwarfs or red dwarfs with a main-sequence companion from Beatty et al 2007;López-Morales 2007;Nefs et al 2013;Tal-Or et al 2013;Zhou et al 2014. Table 2.…”
Section: Mass Radius and Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The center-of-eclipse times for the 49 primary and 50 secondary eclipses were measured in two ways: (i) by using the best-fit model eclipse profile (described in Section 3) as a template and sliding it to best match the individual eclipses; and (ii) using the technique described in Steffen et al (2011) and Welsh et al (2012), which uses a template created from a polynomial fit to the folded eclipse profile. The results were very comparable, so we adopt the former method because it should be less-sensitive to starspot-induced deviations in the mean eclipse profile.…”
Section: The Kepler Light Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainties listed are from the data calibration, but when used in the fitting process the uncertainties were boosted by a factor of 1.6 to achieve a reduced 2 c near 1.0. Several independent spectral analyses were carried out using the higher signal-to-noise HET spectra, including an Stellar Parameter Classification (SPC) analysis (Buchhave et al 2012), an analysis similar to the one for KOI-126 ), a MOOG-based analysis, and by fitting a theoretical template to the spectrum (Tal-Or et al 2013). Each gave similar results, with the best fit T eff ranging from 5480 to 5620 K, and metallicity [m H] ranging from −0.10 to +0.09.…”
Section: The Kepler Light Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%