1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199812)45:4<417::aid-ccd15>3.0.co;2-u
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Coronary vessel perforation during balloon angioplasty: A case report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
25
2
2
0

Citation Types

0
7
0
0

Year Published

Range
1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
23
3
2

Relationship

0
28

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 28 publications

(7 citation statements)
references

References 13 publications

0
7
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In this study, CE for CAP could successfully arrest bleeding in 98.2% cases and is therefore believed to be effective. Suction through a microcatheter, blood clot embolization [ 11 ], fat tissue embolization [ 12 ], and gel foam embolization [ 5 ] could be used instead of CE. However, the coil is visible under fluoroscopy, thereby allowing rapid and accurate delivery.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the coil is visible under fluoroscopy, thereby allowing rapid and accurate delivery. Moreover, the coil has synthetic fibers that facilitate thrombogenicity and can secure better hemostasis than suction maneuver, blood clot [ 11 ], subcutaneous tissue [ 12 ], or gel foam embolization [ 5 ]. A concern after CAP is whether the administration of anticoagulants should be delayed or avoided due to the fear of recurrent bleeding.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation