2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.03.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary artery bypass grafting with concomitant cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with ischaemic heart failure and left ventricular dyssynchrony☆

Abstract: For majority of the patients with ischaemic HF and evidence of LV dyssynchrony, CABG neither eliminates dyssynchrony nor improves systolic function. Epicardial implantation of a CRT system concomitant with CABG facilitates patient management in the early postoperative period, improves LV systolic function and quality of life and is associated with low mortality at 18 months of follow-up.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results have been found in patients with both ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease [2]. Although CABG itself neither eliminates dyssynchrony nor improves systolic function, epicardial implantation of a CRT system concomitant with CABG facilitates patient management in the early postoperative period and improves LV systolic function [3]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Similar results have been found in patients with both ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease [2]. Although CABG itself neither eliminates dyssynchrony nor improves systolic function, epicardial implantation of a CRT system concomitant with CABG facilitates patient management in the early postoperative period and improves LV systolic function [3]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In a small study on CRT with epicardial leads during CABG in patients with HF [12], a better estimated QoL was seen in patients with active CRT. Similarly, CRT improved QoL and LV systolic function after CABG in HF patients with ventricular dyssynchrony [13]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surgical technique results in more successful left lead positioning, same level of clinical improvement, lower left ventricular (LV) related complication rates and lower chronic threshold-capture compared to transvenous lead placement via the coronary sinus [10,11]. Perioperative CRT-implantation in CABG patients seems to carry a positive effect on functional status and QoL in addition to the outcome of surgery [12,13]. The information available on concomitant CRT-implantation in association with cardiac surgery is, however, limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We elected to use the duration of Level 3 care rather than the duration of intensive care to reduce the potential for confounding variables in the primary end-point. Currently, only one trial ( n  = 178) has reported a significant reduction in intensive care stay after cardiac surgery with permanent BiV pacing compared with no BiV pacing [5]. However, the duration of Level 3 care in the BiV pacing group in our study was significantly shorter than in the previous study (40.4 ± 35.0 vs 60.0 ± 12 h; P  = 0.02) [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is achieved by attaching temporary pacing wires to the right atrium (RA), right ventricle (RV) and LV before closing the sternum. Previous studies of permanent BiV pacing have reported acute improvements in haemodynamic function [14] but attempts to reproduce these findings acutely after cardiac surgery have produced mixed results [510]. In addition, one postoperative study has reported no improvement in coronary conduit flow with BiV pacing compared with atrial synchronous RV pacing [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%