Coronally advanced flap in combination with acellular dermal matrix with or without enamel matrix derivatives for root coverage

Pourabbas, Reza; Chitsazi, Mohammad Taghi; Kosarieh, Emad; Olyaee, Pooya

doi:10.4103/0970-9290.57374

Cited by 13 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is clear that less traumatic procedures, with less chair time and involving only one surgical site, are preferred by most patients 1‐10,21‐27 . Independent of such preferences, most of the treated patients considered esthetics as their main concern, and in the great majority, the final outcomes of the performed surgical procedure (irrespective of inclusion of one or more surgical sites) fulfilled their personal expectations 1‐10,21‐27,30‐246 . However, differences among studies in terms of procedures, analysis (i.e., patient based or site based), sample size, follow‐up period, experience of operators, lack of baseline, and final recession characteristics prevent additional conclusions on this topic.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A total of 101 articles 30‐131 with 94 RCTs potentially eligible for inclusion into the pooled estimates were identified in the base of evidence, and their main characteristics (i.e., number and age of participants, interventions, follow‐up period, number of sites exhibiting CRC, MRC [percentage], use of RMAs, randomization, allocation concealment, masking of examiners, completeness of the follow‐up period, and risk of bias) are depicted in Table 2 30‐131 . Seven studies were reported in two articles each, and their data were reported under one study name 37,38,57,58,65,66,83,84,90,91,110,111,115,116 …”

Section: Summary Of What Other Srs Have Evaluatedmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Periodontal Soft Tissue Root Coverage Procedures: A Systematic Review From the AAP Regeneration Workshop

Chambrone

Tatakis

2015

Journal of Periodontology

374

615

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This paper aims to create a ''bridge'' between research and practice by developing a practical, extensive, and clinically relevant study that translates evidence-based findings on soft tissue root coverage (RC) of recession-type defects to daily clinical practice.Methods: This review is prepared in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement based on the proposed focused questions. A literature search with no restrictions regarding status or the language of publication was performed for MEDLINE and EMBASE databases up to and including June 2013. Systematic reviews (SRs), randomized clinical trials, controlled clinical trials, case series, and case reports evaluating recession areas that were treated by means of RC procedures were considered eligible for inclusion through the three parts of the study (part I, an overview of the base of SRs; part II, an alternative random-effects meta-analyses on mean percentage of RC and sites exhibiting complete RC; and part III, an SR of non-randomized trials exploring other conditions not extensively evaluated by previous SRs). Data on Class I, II, III, and IV recessions, type of histologic attachment achieved with treatment, recipient-and donor-site anatomic characteristics, smoking-related outcomes, root surface conditions, tooth type and location, long-term effectiveness outcomes, unusual conditions that may be reported during conventional daily practice, and patient-centered outcomes were assessed as well.Results: Of the 2,456 potentially eligible trials, 234 were included. Data on Class I, II, III, and IV gingival recessions, histologic attachment achieved after treatment, recipient-and donor-site anatomic characteristics, smoking-related outcomes, root surface conditions/biomodification, tooth type and location, long-term effectiveness outcomes and unusual conditions that may be reported during conventional daily practice, and patient-centered outcomes (i.e., esthetic, visual analog scale, complications, hypersensitivity, patients perceptions) were assessed. Subepithelial connective tissue (CT)-based procedures and coronally advanced flap plus acellular dermal matrix grafts, enamel matrix derivative, or collagen matrix led to the best improvements of recession depth, clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, and keratinized tissue (KT). Some conditions, such as smoking and use of magnification, may affect RC outcomes.Conclusions: All RC procedures can provide significant reduction in recession depth and CAL gain for Miller Class I and II recession-type defects. Subepithelial CT graft-based procedures provided the best outcomes for clinical practice because of their superior percentages of mean and complete RC, as well as significant increase of KT. J Periodontol 2015;86(Suppl.):S8-S51.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Summary Of What Other Srs Have Evaluatedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Periodontal Soft Tissue Root Coverage Procedures: A Systematic Review From the AAP Regeneration Workshop

Chambrone

Tatakis

2015

Journal of Periodontology

374

615

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Similar to previously conducted studies (40,41), the MTT assay was used to determine the effect of each restorative material on the cell viability or proliferation over a threeday time period. The results of the MTT assays are shown in Table 3.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

In VitroComparison of the Effects of Dental Filling Materials on Mouse Fibroblasts

Kilic

Kesim

Lïman

et al. 2012

Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…, Pourabbas et al. ) have found that EMD does not contribute to superior outcomes when associated with ADMG, in non‐smokers.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Acellular dermal matrix graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage in smokers: a randomized clinical study

Alves

Costa

Souza

et al. 2012

J Clinic Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Coronally advanced flap in combination with acellular dermal matrix with or without enamel matrix derivatives for root coverage

Abstract: The application of EMD does not improve the clinical efficacy of ADM in combination with CAF in RC procedures.

Cited by 13 publications

References 0 publications

Periodontal Soft Tissue Root Coverage Procedures: A Systematic Review From the AAP Regeneration Workshop

Periodontal Soft Tissue Root Coverage Procedures: A Systematic Review From the AAP Regeneration Workshop

In VitroComparison of the Effects of Dental Filling Materials on Mouse Fibroblasts

Acellular dermal matrix graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage in smokers: a randomized clinical study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About