Coordenação intragovernamental para a implementação da política externa brasileira: o caso do Fórum IBAS

Abstract

N o presente contexto de progressivo adensamento das relações internacionais do Brasil, que tem acarretado a sua crescente politização e a emergência de novos stakeholders, diversos estudos detectam uma perda, ainda que relativa, da capacidade do Itamaraty de coordenar a política externa brasileira. Contudo, se nos últimos anos a comunidade acadêmica brasileira tem se dedicado, de maneira mais sistemática, à análise do modo como o Ministério das Relações Exteriores (MRE) interage com o Poder Legislativo (Alexandre, 2006(Alexandre, , 2007Diniz e Ribeiro, 2008Ferreira, 2010; Lima, 2002; Lima e Santos, 2001; Maia e César, 2004;Neves, 2003 Neves, , 2006 e com os grupos de interesse domésticos (Carvalho, 2003;Cason e Power, 2006; Oliveira e Pfeifer, 2006;Oliveira e Onuki, 2007; Oliveira, M., 2003;Santana, 2001), na agenda de trabalho dos pesquisadores da área ainda há, claramente, uma lacuna importante, relativa à maneira como o Itamaraty procura, na produção da política exterior, articular os demais atores governamentais, que não raro têm interesses e métodos divergentes daqueles da diplomacia do país.

The Economic Face of International Co-operative Arrangements: The Cases of IBSA and CPLP

“…The importance and need for dialog between developing countries and nations in the South has been noted in recent years (IBSA 2003). Figueira & Silva-Rêgo In this sense, as highlighted by Faria, Nogueira, and Lopes (2012), the main IBSA work fronts are as follows: (i) the common challenges of globalisation, (ii) reform of the international system, and (iii) the dialogue on national governance. In this same direction, Pereira (2010) emphasises that the trilateral actions can be divided into two fronts: in the relationship of the countries with the other states and international organisations, and in the internal relationship between the members of the group.…”

“…The number of agreements in the area of trade and investments aimed at regulating and promoting actions in this area are still low, as can be seen in Table 2. On the other hand, from the still scarce set of agreements, there are great expectations regarding the free trade agreement negotiated between MERCO-SUR-India-SACU that, once feasible, can promote and bring great returns to South-South trade (Faria, Nogueira and Lopes 2012). Meanwhile, the free trade agreement between India and MERCOSUR in force since 2009 has not proved to be a differential in terms of boosting trade relations since then.…”

“…Particularly on the India-Brazil-South Africa Dialogue Forum, much of the debate focuses on the role played by the medium powers in the formation of horizontal co-operative arrangements and on setting up the preferences of these agents considering the contemporary international architecture (Guimarães 1998;Ramanzini, Mariano and Almeida 2015;Leite 2011;Saraiva 2007;Lima 2009). There are also those who have tried to understand the origin of this arrangement (IBSA), the singularities of these countries (Faria, Nogueira and Lopes 2012), and the convergences of interests among them, as well as the coherence between the parties in their positions in international organisations (Oliveira, Onuki and Oliveira 2006;Moura 2008).…”

ProSAVANA and the Expanding Scope of Accountability in Brazil's Development Cooperation

“… For detailed analyses on the growing interaction between MRE and other actors see: Lins da Silva (), Cason and Power (), Figueira (), Faria (), Faria et al. () and Souza (). …”

Temática e horizontalização na política externa brasileira: um estudo exploratório do processo decisório nos governos de Fernando Henrique Cardoso

“…Destacando esse segundo aspecto da agenda, o trabalho de Lima (2000) é amplamente reconhecido como o principal marco dessa interpretação Faria, Nogueira…”