2013
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.88.042605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperativity length scale in nanocomposites: Interfacial and confinement effects

Abstract: Interfacial and confinement effects on the evolution of cooperativity on approaching the glass transition have been studied in poly(propylenecoethylene) functionalized with diethylmaleate, polyethylene 1,4-cyclohexylenedimethylene terephthalate glycol and their nanocomposites with montmorillonite. A small increase of the structural dynamic cooperativity, a weak alteration of the temperature dependence of the characteristic relaxation frequency, and no changes in the glass transition temperature observed in pol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(72 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and given in Table . The volume of a CRR ( ξ 3 ) varies in the same range than those calculated for other glass‐formers . It decreases of about 60% as the percentage of TA or ATBC reached 10 %wt.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…and given in Table . The volume of a CRR ( ξ 3 ) varies in the same range than those calculated for other glass‐formers . It decreases of about 60% as the percentage of TA or ATBC reached 10 %wt.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…It is also interesting to notice that the increase of cooperativity in an initially bulk amorphous material is often related to the same cause, i.e. the creation of nano-domains playing the role of anchoring points between the macromolecules [10,51]. In our case, we can reasonably assume that the highly cohesive mesophase plays this role by increasing the level of inter-molecular interactions, thus leading to the global increase of the cooperativity length.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 64%
“…In the second case, the approach of Donth has widely been used to investigate the decrease of cooperativity for two kinds of structural hindrances namely external and internal hindrances. External hindrances are related to geometrical restrictions like the confinement between nanolayers [7,8] or the addition of additives such as fillers [9,10] or plasticizer [11]. On the other hand, internal hindrances are related to the materials itself, in other words its microstructural modifications such as spherulitic crystallization [12,13] or orientation/crystallization of the amorphous phase induced by drawing [5,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the cooperativity length may change when the relaxation is hindered by structural constraints. The decrease of the CRR size under confinement has been reported for nanoparticles, nanolayers, intercalated nanocomposites, and semicrystalline polymers . Any modification of the intermolecular bonds may also impact the cooperativity, as observed in plasticized polylactide, when electro‐donor and electro‐acceptor side groups are associated in statistical methacrylate copolymers, or when π‐stacking is hindered in polycarbonate .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%