2018
DOI: 10.1167/18.10.717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convolutional recurrent neural network models of dynamics in higher visual cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…properties then what we have documented in a purely feed-forward network. In computational models, recurrent connections are often unfolded into feed-forward layers, effectively making a recurrent model a deeper convolutional model (Nayebi et al, 2018). Although we didn't test deeper architectures in our analysis, we expect that the general principles we described should hold for models with more layers and therefore also for models with recurrent connections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…properties then what we have documented in a purely feed-forward network. In computational models, recurrent connections are often unfolded into feed-forward layers, effectively making a recurrent model a deeper convolutional model (Nayebi et al, 2018). Although we didn't test deeper architectures in our analysis, we expect that the general principles we described should hold for models with more layers and therefore also for models with recurrent connections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While previous works modeled flexible dynamic learning in biological [1,18] and artificial This work includes a number of limitations. While we enforced several elements of biological fidelity, future work can still be done to further approximate neural network structure to cortical hierarchical specialization, an approach which has been successful in the sensory domain with convolutional neural networks [20,21]. Additionally, this mechanistic approach must be extended beyond the DMS paradigm to more complex, naturalistic tasks, involving high-dimensional state and decision spaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physiological recordings have uncovered several features of the processing in the human visual system that are relevant to judging the plausibility of the networks examined here. First, the conduction from one area to another in the visual cortex (roughly corresponding to different layers in neural networks) takes approximately 10 ms 48 , with signal from the photoreceptors reaching the top of the visual hierarchy in inferior temporal cortex in 70-100 ms 49 . Therefore, a single sweep from input to output in a purely feedforward network should result in decisions with RT less than a few hundred milliseconds even though human decisions can range from a hundred of milliseconds to a few seconds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, one critical limitation of the biological plausibility of RTNet is its lack of recurrency. That being said, the question of how to train recurrent neural networks on static images remains open 44, 49, 5860 . Further, while the core of RTNet does not include recurrency, the evidence accumulation system can be thought of as a recurrent network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%