International Test Conference, 2003. Proceedings. ITC 2003.
DOI: 10.1109/test.2003.1270904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convolutional compaction of test responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A second category of methods achieves compression by compacting unload data and allowing the tester to selectively ignore measures [14], [15]. However, design and fault-independent test-response compaction necessarily results in some loss of data; therefore, aliasing and X-masking can occur.…”
Section: X-tolerant Compression Of Unload Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second category of methods achieves compression by compacting unload data and allowing the tester to selectively ignore measures [14], [15]. However, design and fault-independent test-response compaction necessarily results in some loss of data; therefore, aliasing and X-masking can occur.…”
Section: X-tolerant Compression Of Unload Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, only part of output responses are sampled for diagnosis or output responses should be compressed by output compaction. Since the volume of output responses for a large SoC (system-on-chip) often exceeds memory capacity of the tester, output compaction is widely used to reduce output test data volume [10,13,12]. Almost all output compression techniques employ lossy compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed input compression method can be used with recent output compaction methods such as X-compact [2], convolutional compaction [25], and i-compact [26] to further reduce test data volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%