2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-017-0166-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence of microengineering and cellular self-organization towards functional tissue manufacturing

Abstract: International audienceTechnical progress in materials science and bioprinting has for the past few decades fostered considerable advances in medicine. More recently, the understanding of the processes of self-organization of cells into three-dimensional multicellular structures and the study of organoids have opened new perspectives for tissue engineering. Here, we review microengineering approaches for building functional tissues, and discuss recent progress in the understanding of morphogenetic processes and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
95
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 260 publications
0
95
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A three-dimensional (3D) cell culture confers a high degree of clinical and biological relevance to in vitro models [1][2][3][4][5]. Compared with conventional two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures, 3D cell cultures allow the cellular self-organization of appropriate extracellular matrix (ECM) assembly with complex cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions that mimic the functional properties of the corresponding tissue in vivo [6][7][8][9][10][11]. To realize the desired 3D cellular processes, numerous 3D biomimetic scaffolds that incorporate different biochemical, mechanical, or architectural cues have been developed for cell cultures [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A three-dimensional (3D) cell culture confers a high degree of clinical and biological relevance to in vitro models [1][2][3][4][5]. Compared with conventional two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures, 3D cell cultures allow the cellular self-organization of appropriate extracellular matrix (ECM) assembly with complex cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions that mimic the functional properties of the corresponding tissue in vivo [6][7][8][9][10][11]. To realize the desired 3D cellular processes, numerous 3D biomimetic scaffolds that incorporate different biochemical, mechanical, or architectural cues have been developed for cell cultures [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore to identify the key elementary processes regulating cell behaviors, a trade-off has to be made between tissue-like morphological mimicry and focused biophysical investigation. Micro-engineering of cell-culture devices now offer the possibility to impose defined spatial boundary conditions at the multi-cellular, cellular or sub-cellular level, which can recapitulate specific geometrical and physical constraints cells are submitted to in vivo (Laurent et al, 2017;Théry, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 12 ] To standardize those promising cell‐based models, scientists now seek to shape and spatially functionalize (decorate) gels into templates. [ 13–15 ] This has been previously achieved through molding and stamping [ 6,7,16 ] and more recently using light and dedicated chemicals. [ 17–22 ]…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%