2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controversies Regarding the Psychometric Properties of the Brief COPE: The Case of the Brazilian-Portuguese Version “COPE Breve”

Abstract: The Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (COPE) inventory investigates the different ways in which people respond to stressful situations. Knowledge is lacking regarding the coping strategies and styles of people in developing countries, including Brazil. This study aimed to adapt and validate the Brief COPE to Brazilian Portuguese (named COPE Breve) by focusing on dispositional coping. For the cross-cultural adaptation, the original Brief COPE in English (28 items grouped into 14 subscales) was ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
32
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Brief COPE (28 items [ 25 ]) was developed to deal with some constrains (e.g., impatience, difficulty in completing) felt by participants with the full COPE, but maintained its original 14-scales, using the items with higher clarity and greater factor loadings. This COPE short version has been applied in different contexts (e.g., Spain [ 36 ]; Chile [ 37 ]; New Zealand [ 52 ]) and with diverse samples (e.g., adults, caregivers for a family member living with adults with HIV/AIDS, adults with mild traumatic injury) [ 40 ], but as we mentioned, psychometric studies purposively involving parents have not been conducted so far, to the best of our knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Brief COPE (28 items [ 25 ]) was developed to deal with some constrains (e.g., impatience, difficulty in completing) felt by participants with the full COPE, but maintained its original 14-scales, using the items with higher clarity and greater factor loadings. This COPE short version has been applied in different contexts (e.g., Spain [ 36 ]; Chile [ 37 ]; New Zealand [ 52 ]) and with diverse samples (e.g., adults, caregivers for a family member living with adults with HIV/AIDS, adults with mild traumatic injury) [ 40 ], but as we mentioned, psychometric studies purposively involving parents have not been conducted so far, to the best of our knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of content and invariance between the Portuguese (448 students) and the Brazilian (1085 students) samples was satisfactory. However, a Brazilian-Portuguese adaptation of the instrument was recently done [ 40 ], in which consistency problems were identified in the subscales referring to first-order coping strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Brief COPE is an instrument that has been widely used in coping research worldwide, some publications previously performed surveys using different structures [9, 22] than the original Brief COPE version [7]. The authors provided structures with a different number of factors (eight [9], seven [22], five [23], and three [2426] factors), explored in different sociocultural contexts [23, 26], and among various groups of individuals (healthy individuals, ill individuals [22, 25], and caregivers [23, 26]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Brief COPE is an instrument that has been widely used in coping research worldwide, some publications previously performed surveys using different structures [9,22] than the original Brief COPE version [7]. The authors provided structures with a different number of factors (eight [9], seven [22], five [23], and three [24][25][26] factors), explored in different sociocultural contexts [23,26], and among various groups of individuals (healthy individuals, ill individuals [22,25], and caregivers [23,26]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%