2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling Structure and Dimensions of a Disordered Protein via Mutations

Abstract: The dimensions of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to small energetic-entropic differences between intramolecular and protein–solvent interactions. This is commonly observed on modulating solvent composition and temperature. However, the inherently heterogeneous conformational landscape of IDPs is also expected to be influenced by mutations that can (de)stabilize pockets of local and even global structure, native and non-native, and hence the average dimensions. Here, we show experimental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite our nascent understanding of the mechanisms that encode disordered ensembles within primary sequences, we are beginning to see early evidence of the potential "tunability" of the structural propensities of IDRs through point mutations. For example, Munshi et al 87 modulated the dimensions of CytR DNAbinding domain, a high sequence-complexity IDP, through the introduction of rationally positioned point mutations. These mutations resulted in a maximal reduction in the Stokes radius of ∼3.5 Å of the disordered CytR ensemble, corresponding to 40% reduction in occupied volume compared to the mutant with the most extended set of conformers.…”
Section: ■ Mechanisms Of Collapse and Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite our nascent understanding of the mechanisms that encode disordered ensembles within primary sequences, we are beginning to see early evidence of the potential "tunability" of the structural propensities of IDRs through point mutations. For example, Munshi et al 87 modulated the dimensions of CytR DNAbinding domain, a high sequence-complexity IDP, through the introduction of rationally positioned point mutations. These mutations resulted in a maximal reduction in the Stokes radius of ∼3.5 Å of the disordered CytR ensemble, corresponding to 40% reduction in occupied volume compared to the mutant with the most extended set of conformers.…”
Section: ■ Mechanisms Of Collapse and Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disordered DNA-binding domain (DBD) from Escherichia coli CytR (cytidine repressor) can serve as a unique model system for exploring this approach, given that the native ensemble is at the threshold of order. Specifically, mutations , (hydrophobic or charged residue substitutions), small changes in solvent conditions , (salts, independent of charge density or identity, and TMAO), and the presence of DNA , (specific or nonspecific binding sites) can drive the system toward the folded conformation (Figure ). The resulting unfolding curves and thermodynamics of (de)­stabilization are also amenable to detailed characterization via the statistical mechanical Wako–Saitô–Muñoz–Eaton (WSME) model, ,, enabling an ensemble-based description while also accounting for diverse intramolecular energetics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the structure and dynamics of the CytR DBD allows us to further hypothesize about the link between protein flexibility and DNA recognition. The intrinsic disorder of the free CytR DBD has been confirmed and compared to LacR [7,[13][14][15][16][17][18]. Our characterization of the nonspecifically bound state classify CytR as forming a fuzzy complex with DNA where the bound protein is only partially structured [19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Thus, the CytR DBD can be characterized as an intrinsically disordered protein (IDP). Since our CytR DBD structure was published, it has been used as a paradigm in understanding IDPs in comparison to other folded LacR DBDs [7,[13][14][15][16][17][18]].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%