Control Societies and Platform Logic

Abstract

This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. ABSTRACT: Deleuze's concept of the control society presciently sketches a world of power as 'universal modulation'. This article investigates the applicability of this understanding of control to today's socio-technical systems. It examines Deleuze's control society through the philosophy of cybernetics, situating a restrictive interpretation with reference to Norbert Weiner's theory of control systems in animals and machines. We argue that in maintaining a concept of control-as-homeostatic feedback modulation, cybernetic readings tend to ignore the constructive, enabling dimension of control. To remedy this, we analyse a recent concept developed in the field of business studies of information technology: the platform. Extrapolating beyond the existing literature of platform design, we develop a generalised theory of the platform as an alternative model of control, through the concept of generative entrenchment. Permanent repository link

Epigenomics and the Xenoformed Earth: Bioinformatic Ruminations with Gilbert Simondon

“…The local milieu of the generator–river–dam is eroded under the pressure of ‘The Stack’, a planetary ‘megastructure’ of global computing that materially redraws a map of the world as crisscrossed by sub-oceanic cables and speckled with mountain-protected data-centers (Bratton, 2016). Combined with Alex Williams’ (2015: 218) concept of ‘platform capitalism’, as ‘a foundation for other entities, artefacts, and processes to be built upon’, the stretching out of networks of control opens doors for the global business of postgenomics. The effect of planetary networking is as if every person owned and operated a Guimbal generator in their backyard, as if each person’s perspective was augmented by their interaction with the technical object.…”

Can the power of platforms be harnessed for governance?

“…A second concern is who extracts the value from platforms and whose views, values and interests do they advance (Pasquale ; Gillespie ; Moore and Tambini )? A third concern is that digital platforms may violate privacy and create insidious modes of social control (Williams ; Arora ; Caprotti and Liu ).…”

Automatic for the People? Cybernetics and Left‐Accelerationism

“…In contrast, “platforms” are design architectures that work primarily not through constraint, but by enabling actions through positive feedback circuits that cannot be prefigured in advance. Platforms, writes Williams (2015, p. 223), are “materialised transcendentals – they act as conditions of possibility for other processes and entities to exist.” As “entrenched” infrastructures they do restrain in certain ways (for example, Microsoft owns the vast majority of home computer operating systems and forces users to conform to its licensing arrangements and surreptitious forms of data collection), but they also provide the ground for unpredictably contingent or “generative” outcomes, and hence contain hitherto‐untapped potentialities for autonomous self‐organization outside the aegis of state and capital. Yet, Williams is notably vague on what forms of such self‐organization might be possible here, or what exactly is being “enhanced” through the utilization of such platforms in ways that might be considered “emancipatory,” assuming this doesn't bolster the hegemonic power and virtual ubiquity of existing platforms.…”

“…Recently, however, there has been a more positive reappraisal of cybernetics. Central to this reassessment is the work of such "Left-accelerationists" as Nick Srnicek and Alex Williams, 2014aWilliams, , 2014bWilliams, , 2015, who dismiss the Orwellian fears around cybernetics and argue that "cunning automata" can be liberated from the directionless and irrational constraints of capital. This might allow us to enter a world of extensive and intensive cyberplanning, thereby "repurposing" the very material infrastructure of capitalism itself, to universally emancipatory ends.…”