2016
DOI: 10.1155/2016/8021690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control Performance and Robustness of Pounding Tuned Mass Damper for Vibration Reduction in SDOF Structure

Abstract: This paper investigates the control performance of pounding tuned mass damper (PTMD) in reducing the dynamic responses of SDOF (Single Degree of Freedom) structure. Taking an offshore jacket-type platform as an example, the optimal damping ratio and the gap between mass block and viscoelastic material are presented depending on a parametric study. Control efficiency influenced by material properties and contact geometries for PTMD is analyzed here, as well as robustness of the device. The results of numerical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the primary structure response, the mass ratio has little e ect and its regularity is poor, while the frequency ratio has a greater e ect and is more regular. However, the primary structure response is less robust [27] at a low frequency (approximately 0.5 to the limit). Compared to the primary structure, the e ect of the frequency and mass ratios on the secondary structure is greater, and the e ect of the mass ratio is more regular.…”
Section: Parameter Analysis Under Random Earthquakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the primary structure response, the mass ratio has little e ect and its regularity is poor, while the frequency ratio has a greater e ect and is more regular. However, the primary structure response is less robust [27] at a low frequency (approximately 0.5 to the limit). Compared to the primary structure, the e ect of the frequency and mass ratios on the secondary structure is greater, and the e ect of the mass ratio is more regular.…”
Section: Parameter Analysis Under Random Earthquakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another benefit of the viscoelastic delimiter is that it can enhance the robustness of the PTMD. According to the literature [9,10], in the off-tuned case, the relative motion between the tuned mass and the delimiter is larger than that of the optimal-tuned case. Therefore, in the off-tuned case, the added mass will impact the viscoelastic material more severely, generating a larger pounding force, resulting in larger momentum exchange and energy dissipation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In other words, the viscoelastic delimiter introduced the energy dissipation mechanism for impacts to the PTMD. Therefore, the PTMD is more effective than the regular TMD in vibration reduction [8,9]. Another benefit of the viscoelastic delimiter is that it can enhance the robustness of the PTMD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplicity of the design allows the PTMD to be easily adapted to different conditions and usages; and since the PTMD is robust and can maintain its performance for long periods of time, the need for maintenance is reduced. In recent years, PTMD has been extensively studied for implementation in different types of facilities [37][38][39][40], including frame structures [41], subsea jumpers [42,43], power transmission towers [44], etc. In a previous study by the authors [45], two types of PTMDs (spring steel type and pendulum type) associated with viscoelastic (VE) material were designed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%