2016 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo, Asia-Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/itec-ap.2016.7513067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control method of propulsion control device for AC railway vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the MIC method, the SFC method is more attractive because it has no such modulation index limitation in the full speed range [22]. As one variable related to the DC‐link voltage is used for frequency compensation, the low‐frequency beat voltage is suppressed [23–25]. However, the key drawback of the SFC method is that the amplitude of the high‐frequency beat voltage will be doubled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the MIC method, the SFC method is more attractive because it has no such modulation index limitation in the full speed range [22]. As one variable related to the DC‐link voltage is used for frequency compensation, the low‐frequency beat voltage is suppressed [23–25]. However, the key drawback of the SFC method is that the amplitude of the high‐frequency beat voltage will be doubled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%