2022
DOI: 10.3390/act11040104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control Allocation Design for Torpedo-Like Underwater Vehicles with Multiple Actuators

Abstract: For solving the transformation problem between the desired nonlinear control laws and installed actuators’ input commands of torpedo-like underwater vehicles, one closed-form control allocation method is proposed in this article. The goal of this study is to optimally distribute the desired nonlinear control law to each single actuator installed on the torpedo-like underwater vehicle. The first step of this proposed control allocation method is to arrange the required types, numbers, and positions of the insta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [6], the formula u = B † τ c is used, where B † is the control allocation matrix calculated from pseudo-inverse of the AUV's actuator configuration matrix B. The use of the actuator configuration matrix pseudoinverse (Moore-Penrose inverse) for control allocation is also explored for underactuated and fully actuated underwater vehicle configurations [35][36][37]48]. For our controller, we replace the control allocation matrix B † with a dynamic term B that is updated based on actuator faultiness, so that the pseudo-inverse operation is no longer used.…”
Section: Control Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [6], the formula u = B † τ c is used, where B † is the control allocation matrix calculated from pseudo-inverse of the AUV's actuator configuration matrix B. The use of the actuator configuration matrix pseudoinverse (Moore-Penrose inverse) for control allocation is also explored for underactuated and fully actuated underwater vehicle configurations [35][36][37]48]. For our controller, we replace the control allocation matrix B † with a dynamic term B that is updated based on actuator faultiness, so that the pseudo-inverse operation is no longer used.…”
Section: Control Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on control allocation for AUVs is not as plentiful as the works on control law design and is mainly focused on minimizing the individual actuator outputs to produce the desired control authority. This optimization has been achieved using linear and quadratic optimization [33,34], and the pseudo-inverse of the matrix corresponding to actuator configurations consisting purely of control surfaces [35,36] or thrusters [37,38]. Fault tolerance through control allocation is explored in the works regarding thruster configurations, where control is allocated to four thrusters using the pseudo-inverse of the actuator configuration matrix multiplied by weights based on thruster faultiness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Thrusters as universal power components are often used in AUVs. 6,7 However, thrusters are prone to different faults due to terrible working conditions. 8 Thruster faults maybe not only make AUVs unable to complete the task, but also make them unable to recover themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%