2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of ship emissions to the concentration of PM2.5: A comprehensive study using AIS data and WRF/Chem model in Bohai Rim Region, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; when ship activities occur in correspondence of wind blowing from the port area to the receptor site). This finding comes from measurements of O 3 , NOx, SO 2 and PM 2.5 in Brindisi 8 , of PM 2.5 in Shangai 9 , in Bohain Rim region 6 and in Los Angeles 7 and, finally, of SO 2 in Victoria (Canada) 4 . Results indicate that ships can contribute to 20-30% of the total PM 2.5 but only during ship-plume-influenced periods 9 , and about 11% at 10 km from the coastline.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; when ship activities occur in correspondence of wind blowing from the port area to the receptor site). This finding comes from measurements of O 3 , NOx, SO 2 and PM 2.5 in Brindisi 8 , of PM 2.5 in Shangai 9 , in Bohain Rim region 6 and in Los Angeles 7 and, finally, of SO 2 in Victoria (Canada) 4 . Results indicate that ships can contribute to 20-30% of the total PM 2.5 but only during ship-plume-influenced periods 9 , and about 11% at 10 km from the coastline.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In fact, a large contribution of cruise ship emissions in Victoria's port (Canada) is observed at about 1 km from the mooring points 4 and up to 5 km inland at Taranto (Italy) 5 . The highest impact of ship emissions of PM 2.5 is estimated at 10 km from the coastline in Bohain Rim region (China) 6 and at about 1 km from the port source in Los Angeles 7 . It is also generally highlighted that the influence of ship emissions on pollutant concentration at ground is statistically relevant only during ship-plume-influenced periods (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the performance of the WRF/Chem model has been extensively evaluated in our previous studies [6,53,55] and those of other researchers [76][77][78][79][80][81], we must nonetheless provide detailed information on the model's performance during the sea breeze episode in this study. Similar evaluation methods to those employed by Chen et al [6] were applied in the Bohai Rim Region. The simulated results of meteorological factors (e.g., temperature at 2 m, T 2 ; relative humidity at 2 m, RH 2 ; wind speed at 10 m, WS 10 ; wind direction at 10 m, WD 10 ) were compared with ground-based meteorological observations that were available every three hours at four sites (Tianjin, Binhai, Tangshan, and Leting), as marked by the black triangle in Figure 1.…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, present studies that have quantified the impacts of ship emissions have primarily focused on overall contributions based on long-term (e.g., annual or seasonal) modeling/observations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][53][54][55][56][57]. The evolution of ship-emitted pollutants during a specific sea breeze episode has not been addressed in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, PM can cause economical losses (i.e., labor loss as a result of work days lost and extra medical expenditure) as well as environmental impacts, such as climate change and visibility degradation [7][8][9]. Previous studies have revealed that different size ranges of PM can be emitted from various sources with different fingerprints [10,11]. PM from different sources might have different toxicological characteristics as well as different impacts on visibility, and radiative forcing, supporting the postulation that PM mass concentration is not the most appropriate metric to investigate the adverse effects of PM [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%