2002
DOI: 10.1053/sper.2002.29850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of late fetal deaths to US perinatal mortality rates, 1995–1998

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The two extremes of abnormal fetal growth are restricted growth and excessive growth; at both extremes, the fetus must adapt to survive (1). Small‐for‐gestation‐age (SGA) 1 infants are a public health problem because they are at higher risk for morbidity and rehospitalization during the first year of life (2, 3). In addition, long‐term complications of reduced fetal growth have been identified in the past 10 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two extremes of abnormal fetal growth are restricted growth and excessive growth; at both extremes, the fetus must adapt to survive (1). Small‐for‐gestation‐age (SGA) 1 infants are a public health problem because they are at higher risk for morbidity and rehospitalization during the first year of life (2, 3). In addition, long‐term complications of reduced fetal growth have been identified in the past 10 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies documenting greater underreporting and misclassification of deaths at the extremes of birth weight and gestational age prompted states to focus on changes in reporting of extremely low birth weight deliveries of live-born infants and early fetal losses [5][6][7][8]. All states examined historic changes in definitions of fetal deaths based on birth weight and/or gestational age, along with changes in the completeness of reporting of fetal and infant deaths.…”
Section: Assessment Data Reporting: Definition and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incomplete reporting of live births less than 500 grams (g) and changes in state reporting rules for fetal deaths, resulting in more fetal deaths or fetal deaths being recorded as live births, may mask improvements in neonatal mortality despite clear reductions in birth-weight-specific mortality [4]. Timeliness of data availability affects the speed with which programs can detect changes in IMR and respond.Studies documenting greater underreporting and misclassification of deaths at the extremes of birth weight and gestational age prompted states to focus on changes in reporting of extremely low birth weight deliveries of live-born infants and early fetal losses [5][6][7][8]. All states examined historic changes in definitions of fetal deaths based on birth weight and/or gestational age, along with changes in the completeness of reporting of fetal and infant deaths.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] Factors that might have contributed to the decline in cigarette use include (1) a 90% increase in the retail price of cigarettes during December 1997-May 2003, 5 (2) increases in school-based efforts to prevent tobacco use, and (3) increases in the proportion of young persons who have been exposed through the mass media to smoking-prevention campaigns funded by states or the American Legacy Foundation. 6 Factors that might have slowed the rate of decline in cigarette use among young persons include (1) tobacco industry expenditures on tobacco advertising and promotion, which increased from $5.7 billion in 1997 to $11.2 billion in 2001 7 ; (2) reductions in Master Settlement Agreement funds used for tobacco-use prevention; and (3) the frequency with which smoking was depicted in films. 8 The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%