2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous measurements of soil respiration with and without roots in a ponderosa pine plantation in the Sierra Nevada Mountains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
117
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
15
117
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, seasonally driven soil respiration-temperature response curves appear to be largely adequate at predicting how future warming will alter fluxes of CO 2 from soils to the atmosphere. Nevertheless, the relative roles of autotrophic versus heterotrophic soil respiration and how these processes change with warming remains poorly defined but critical to understanding the strength of soil respiration feedbacks to climate change (30). In addition, it is unclear if the lack of difference in respiration response between control versus warmed treatments that we observe here will persist over the long term because the majority of the extant experiments have a relatively short duration (<5 y).…”
Section: Limited Evidence Of Acclimation Of Soil Respiration To Expermentioning
confidence: 51%
“…That is, seasonally driven soil respiration-temperature response curves appear to be largely adequate at predicting how future warming will alter fluxes of CO 2 from soils to the atmosphere. Nevertheless, the relative roles of autotrophic versus heterotrophic soil respiration and how these processes change with warming remains poorly defined but critical to understanding the strength of soil respiration feedbacks to climate change (30). In addition, it is unclear if the lack of difference in respiration response between control versus warmed treatments that we observe here will persist over the long term because the majority of the extant experiments have a relatively short duration (<5 y).…”
Section: Limited Evidence Of Acclimation Of Soil Respiration To Expermentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Recent studies also found that the CA method could measure Rs comparably with the IRGA method if properly implemented and corrected (Grogan, 1998;Keith and Wong, 2006). The CO 2 gradient method has also been adopted by some researchers because of its minimal disturbance during the measurements (De Jong and Schappert, 1972;Tang et al, 2005b;Pingintha et al, 2010), but this method also has limitations, such as the empirically determined CO 2 diffusivity in soils and the disturbances to soils introduced by the initial installation of the CO 2 sensors. There have been a number of studies and reviews comparing different methods to measure Rs and discussing the strengths and limitations of each method (Hanson et al, 2000;Davidson et al, 2002b;Hibbard et al, 2005;Pendall et al, 2004;Ryan and Law, 2005).…”
Section: Methods and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With soil CO 2 concentrations profiles, the location of production of CO 2 within the soil profile can be determined (Hashimoto and Komatsu 2006;Risk et al 2002b), but the calculation of soil respiration is dependent on the proper estimate of multiple physical factors such as: (1) variation in soil water content that change CO 2 diffusivity in the soil (Šimůnek and Suarez 1993); and (2) the proper estimation of tortuosity, soil texture, bulk density and porosity which are difficult to determine in rocky soils or water saturated soils (Jassal et al 2005;Pumpanen et al 2008;Turcu et al 2005). Despite limitations of both methods, when used in combination, multiple studies have shown good agreement between the two (Jassal et al 2005;Tang et al 2005b;Turcu et al 2005;Vargas and Allen 2008b).…”
Section: Continuous Measurements Of Soil Respirationmentioning
confidence: 99%