2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context-dependent responses to novelty in Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), selected for high and low post-stress cortisol responsiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
22
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the duration in confinement was considerably higher in studies that utilized confinement to discriminate for stress coping styles (30 min at least, [17,32,33,56]) compared with this study (5 min). Moreover, these studies [17,25,30,32,33,55,56] were performed on round fishes, whereas in a flatfish species such as Senegalese sole, the perception of this test was probably different. Placing a fish in confinement where swimming is difficult or not possible would have different effects on a round fish that is constantly swimming compared with a flatfish that leads a largely stationary life on the bottom and differences in the species reaction to confinement would be expected and could be tested by looking at cortisol and other stress indicators.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the duration in confinement was considerably higher in studies that utilized confinement to discriminate for stress coping styles (30 min at least, [17,32,33,56]) compared with this study (5 min). Moreover, these studies [17,25,30,32,33,55,56] were performed on round fishes, whereas in a flatfish species such as Senegalese sole, the perception of this test was probably different. Placing a fish in confinement where swimming is difficult or not possible would have different effects on a round fish that is constantly swimming compared with a flatfish that leads a largely stationary life on the bottom and differences in the species reaction to confinement would be expected and could be tested by looking at cortisol and other stress indicators.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The confinement assay has been considered as a fearful test because it induces differences in cortisol, a factor that is strongly linked to behaviours indicating fearfulness [30]. However, the duration in confinement was considerably higher in studies that utilized confinement to discriminate for stress coping styles (30 min at least, [17,32,33,56]) compared with this study (5 min). Moreover, these studies [17,25,30,32,33,55,56] were performed on round fishes, whereas in a flatfish species such as Senegalese sole, the perception of this test was probably different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This suggests that reactive fish exhibit higher levels of behavioural flexibility. However, another study using the same selected trout lines suggested that depending on the context, proactive individual may adopt a more flexible behaviour [22]. One possibility to explain the differences found in the present study using seabream as compared to Laursen et al [34] is the existence of species-specific differences in sub-lethal effects of reduced levels of dissolved oxygen; around 3 mg.L −1 in trout [44] and 1 mg.L −1 in seabream [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Even if the intensity of the behaviour changes, the rank position in relation to others, remains the same [1], [21]. A recent study using selected lines of rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ), proactive and reactive individuals were shown to exhibit consistency over a period of 7 days in traits associated to coping styles, feeding responses, presence of a novel object, aggressiveness and confinement [22]. Most of the studies on coping styles characterization have been done on selected fish lines which raises the question whether similar consistency responses can be observed in non-selected populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, individuals with a proactive coping style respond to a challenge with a high adrenaline (epinephrine) and low glucocorticoid release, and trigger a fight-flight behavioural response. They also show a propensity for social dominance and develop and follow routines easily (Basic et al, 2012;Koolhaas et al, 1999;Ruiz-Gomez et al, 2011). When reactive individuals are provoked, they show a freeze-hide response with a low adrenaline and high glucocorticoid release (Koolhaas et al, 1999;Schjolden and Winberg, 2007), avoiding danger by keeping a low profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%