1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(98)00127-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints to milk production in grazing dairy cows in Brazil and management strategies for improving their productivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The long calving intervals reported here are in agreement with data reported by Abdalla et al (1999); the major causes of infertility among the animals were difficulties in heat detection and the unreliability of AI/bull services, poor semen-handling and semen-deposition techniques. Alejandrino et al (1999) indicated that poor breeding management, the availability of a bull of proven fertility, good quality semen for AI, and nutritional stress, particularly during critical periods of the cow's reproductive life, were the most important factors influencing smallholder dairy cattle productivity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The long calving intervals reported here are in agreement with data reported by Abdalla et al (1999); the major causes of infertility among the animals were difficulties in heat detection and the unreliability of AI/bull services, poor semen-handling and semen-deposition techniques. Alejandrino et al (1999) indicated that poor breeding management, the availability of a bull of proven fertility, good quality semen for AI, and nutritional stress, particularly during critical periods of the cow's reproductive life, were the most important factors influencing smallholder dairy cattle productivity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In line with our prediction two, stocking density had a negative effect on milk yield, which is in accordance with previous findings (Macdonald et al, 2008). The negative correlation between pasture shade and stocking density may show that the farmers are adjusting stocking density in order to maintain milk production and body condition as found by Abdalla et al (1999). There was an interactive effect between pasture shade and stocking density on both average daily milk yield and body condition score.…”
Section: Pasture Shade and Stocking Density Effects On Productionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Lowest yields were at the end of lactation in May and June, which was similar to other reports for Brazil based on Brizantha spp. without supplementation (Abdalla et al, 1999;Euclides et al, 1993;. Mean milk yield in October was 7.0 ± 0.26 kg/d, indicating similar forage and body tissue support of milk production at the end of the dry season compared to months with rainfall.…”
Section: Observed Animal Responsesmentioning
confidence: 95%