2013
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/07/046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on dark matter annihilation from CMB observations before Planck

Abstract: We compute the bounds on the dark matter (DM) annihilation cross section using the most recent Cosmic Microwave Background measurements from WMAP9, SPT'11 and ACT'10. We consider DM with mass in the MeV-TeV range annihilating 100% into either an e + e − or a µ + µ − pair. We consider a realistic energy deposition model, which includes the dependence on the redshift, DM mass and annihilation channel. We exclude the canonical thermal relic abundance cross section ( σv = 3×10 −26 cm 3 s −1 ) for DM masses below 3… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
138
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
(247 reference statements)
6
138
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the diffuse γ-ray background in the Milky Way and its companion galaxies (dwarf spheroidals), as well as from distortions of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and both high energy positrons and antiprotons. Altogether these measurements already rule out the simplest 1 thermal, velocity independent, dark matter scenarios with a mass ranging from a few MeV [2,3] to ∼100 GeV (see e.g. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]), but here we show that one can go a step further.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…the diffuse γ-ray background in the Milky Way and its companion galaxies (dwarf spheroidals), as well as from distortions of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and both high energy positrons and antiprotons. Altogether these measurements already rule out the simplest 1 thermal, velocity independent, dark matter scenarios with a mass ranging from a few MeV [2,3] to ∼100 GeV (see e.g. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]), but here we show that one can go a step further.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Constraints from CMB distortions are largely insensitive to systematic uncertainties [96][97][98][99][100][101][102], and with the latest CMB data from Planck correspond to the limit [89] f eff σv m χ 3 × 10 −28 cm 3 /s/GeV . (5.5)…”
Section: Indirect Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One particular indirect detection method is to observe the effect of dark matter annihilation early in the history of the Universe (1400 > z > 100) on the CMB temperature and polarization anisotropies [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. If dark matter particles self-annihilate at a sufficient rate, the expected signal would be directly sensitive to the thermally averaged cross section hσvi of the dark matter particles in this epoch, the mass M χ of the annihilating particle, and the particular annihilation channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%