2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints in estimating the proton density fat fraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No additional preprocessing was necessary for the T1w 3D data for the pancreas. Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* were estimated from the single-slice multi-echo data for the liver and pancreas ( Bydder et al, 2020b ). The R2* values were converted into iron concentrations ( McKay et al, 2018 ; Wood et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No additional preprocessing was necessary for the T1w 3D data for the pancreas. Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* were estimated from the single-slice multi-echo data for the liver and pancreas ( Bydder et al, 2020b ). The R2* values were converted into iron concentrations ( McKay et al, 2018 ; Wood et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…systems with phantoms(48, 82,(112)(113)(114). For the MRIdian 0.35T MRI, a few DWI studies have been performed, demonstrating the ADC accuracy and reproducibility, as well as improving DWI spatial integrity(48,112).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the MRIdian 0.35T MRI, a few DWI studies have been performed, demonstrating the ADC accuracy and reproducibility, as well as improving DWI spatial integrity(48,112). Studies of Nejad-Davarini et al (82) and Bydder et al(113) also explored feasibility and accuracy of T1 mapping, R2* mapping, proton density mapping, and proton density fat fraction using MRIdian. A multicenter study showed that consistent ADC, T1, T2, and DCE values can be measured across institutes with a Unity system…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This acquisition was stopped for the liver after the first 10,000 subjects (approximately) and replaced by the IDEAL sequence, but was continued for the pancreas for all subjects. A single-slice IDEAL sequence (Reeder et al, 2005) for the liver used the following parameters: TR = 14 ms, TE = 1.2/3.2/5.2/7.2/9.2/11.2 ms, FA = 5°, bandwidth = 1565 Hz, voxel size 1.719 x 1.719 x 10.0 mm and 256 x 232 matrix. We applied bias-field correction to each echo time separately to facilitate 2D segmentation. Software (https://github.com/marcsous/pdff) available from Dr Mark Bydder, specifically the PRESCO (Phase Regularized Estimation using Smoothing and Constrained Optimization) algorithm (Bydder et al, 2020), was used to simultaneously estimate the proton density fat fraction (PDFF, referred to as fat in results) and transverse relaxivity (R2*) values voxelwise from the single-slice gradient echo (GRE) and IDEAL acquisitions. Essentially, a multi-peak spectrum was constructed from the echo times in the acquisition protocol and used to perform nonlinear least squares under multiple regularization constraints that extends the IDEAL (Iterative Decomposition of Water and Fat with Echo Asymmetry and Least-Squares Estimation) algorithm (Reeder et al, 2005; Yu et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single-slice data (Gradient Multi-Echo (GRE) and IDEAL) used for liver and pancreas quantification had bias-field correction applied to each echo time separately for 2D segmentation. We used the PRESCO (Phase Regularized Estimation using Smoothing and Constrained Optimization) algorithm 75 to simultaneously estimate PDFF (referred to as fat in results) and R2* values voxelwise from the (uncorrected) GRE and IDEAL acquisitions. For consistency with previous studies 55, 76 , we convert R2* into iron concentration (mg/g) using the formula: iron concentration = 0.202 + 0.0254 x R2*.…”
Section: Image Preprocessing Pipelinementioning
confidence: 99%