2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30203-2_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints and Application Conditions: From Graphs to High-Level Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In graph-based modelling (and meta-modelling), graphs are used to define the static structures, such as class and object ones, which represent visual alphabets and sentences over them. We formalise our approach using the typed graph transformation approach, specifically the Double Pushout (DPO) algebraic approach, with positive and negative (nested) application conditions [11,23]. We however carry on our formalisation for weak adhesive high-level replacement (HLR) categories [12].…”
Section: Graph Transformation and Adhesive Hlr Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In graph-based modelling (and meta-modelling), graphs are used to define the static structures, such as class and object ones, which represent visual alphabets and sentences over them. We formalise our approach using the typed graph transformation approach, specifically the Double Pushout (DPO) algebraic approach, with positive and negative (nested) application conditions [11,23]. We however carry on our formalisation for weak adhesive high-level replacement (HLR) categories [12].…”
Section: Graph Transformation and Adhesive Hlr Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We apply well-known techniques, e.g., for transforming constraints to sufficient and necessary application conditions [4], which have already been shown in previous work [1,8] to be applicable in general to TGGs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of the transformation A is a case differentiation of all possible overlappings of the additional elements in codom(m) with the elements in the objects of the condition c. Transformation A generalizes the corresponding construction for "basic conditions" in [EEHP06], first described for graphs in [HW95]. At first view, it is similar to the construction of Theorem 3.12, but most importantly, as m ∈ M, the pushout is guaranteed to exist.…”
Section: Basic Transformations On Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shortly thereafter, conditions for graphs of the form ∀(I ֒→ P, ∃(P → C)) were introduced as graph consistency constraints in [HW95]. The concepts of graph constraints and application conditions of [HW95] were lifted to weak adhesive HLR categories in [EEHP06,EEHP04], and, unified and generalized to nested conditions in [Ren04a] for edge-labeled graphs (without parallel edges) and in [Pen04,HP05] for weak adhesive HLR categories.…”
Section: ∃( )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation