1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0264-3707(97)00020-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constrains on the source of the 1755 Lisbon tsunami inferred from numerical modelling of historical data on the source of the 1755 Lisbon tsunami

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
88
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
88
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When dealing with the chances of re-occurrence, continued overestimation of the height of the tsunami waves at shoreline could prove detrimental to a proper assessment of the risk, and of the need for warning, mitigation and remediation plans: the published results show that the numerical models are unable to generate waves in the 15 to 25 m range of height (Baptista et al, 1998b(Baptista et al, , 2003Gutscher et al, 2006), at least when investigating plausible seismic sources: this would make the 1755 tsunami, as defined in the classical interpretation of the records, an exceptional event, out of the range of the normal possibilities of Physics: it may have appeared acceptable in the eighteenth century, when the quarrel between the "Catastrophists" and the followers of the "Actual Causes" had not yet taken place, let alone been resolved. Somehow, it also appeared to justify the heavy impact of the event on the ideas of the time: the Priests advised the transgressors to repent, while the Philosophers pointed out to the fact that Lisbon never was more sinful than any other European capital.…”
Section: Human Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When dealing with the chances of re-occurrence, continued overestimation of the height of the tsunami waves at shoreline could prove detrimental to a proper assessment of the risk, and of the need for warning, mitigation and remediation plans: the published results show that the numerical models are unable to generate waves in the 15 to 25 m range of height (Baptista et al, 1998b(Baptista et al, , 2003Gutscher et al, 2006), at least when investigating plausible seismic sources: this would make the 1755 tsunami, as defined in the classical interpretation of the records, an exceptional event, out of the range of the normal possibilities of Physics: it may have appeared acceptable in the eighteenth century, when the quarrel between the "Catastrophists" and the followers of the "Actual Causes" had not yet taken place, let alone been resolved. Somehow, it also appeared to justify the heavy impact of the event on the ideas of the time: the Priests advised the transgressors to repent, while the Philosophers pointed out to the fact that Lisbon never was more sinful than any other European capital.…”
Section: Human Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we focused our attention on Global Sensitivity Analysis approaches which rely on sampling based methods for uncertainty propagation, willing to fully map the space of possible 10 model predictions from the various model uncertain input parameters and then, allowing to rank the significance of the input parameter uncertainty contribution to the model output variability (Baroni and Tarantola, 2014). GSA approaches are well suited to be applied with models having nonlinear behaviour and when interaction among parameters occurs (Saint-Geours, 2012).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis (Step D)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, source location and contemporary effects of such tsunami are not precisely identified. Several earthquake scenarios have already been published in the literature since last decades (Baptista et al, 1998;Grandin et al, 2007;Gutscher et al, 2006;Horsburgh et al, 2008;Johnston, 1996;Zitellini et al, 1999), mainly based on a comparison of several fault hypothesis based on geological properties of the Azores-Gibraltar fault zone (AGFZ). All of 10 these studies show how variable parameters of the seismic source can be, depending on the studied fault and focal mechanisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies on the likely source area of the famous 1755 Lisbon tsunami, which followed a magnitude 8.5 earthquake and caused about 60 000 casualties (Baptista et al 1998; see also Canals et al 2004 and references therein), have identified a potential tsunamigenic fault source and associated mass movements (Gracia et al 2003). During the 1929 Great Banks earthquake and associated landslides initial slope failure occurred near the earthquake epicentre and were followed by a catastrophic tsunami.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%