2015
DOI: 10.1007/jhep03(2015)133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining the Higgs portal with antiprotons

Abstract: The scalar Higgs portal is a compelling model of dark matter (DM) in which a renormalizable coupling with the Higgs boson provides the connection between the visible world and the dark sector. In this paper we investigate the constraint placed on the parameter space of this model by the antiproton data. Due to the fact that the antiprotonto-proton ratio has relative less systematic uncertainties than the antiproton absolute flux, we propose and explore the possibility to combine all the availablep/p data. Foll… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of the Higgs portal coupling is highly constrained by the bound on the invisible Higgs width for a general scalar, while for a DM candidate obtaining the observed relic density while also satisfying direct detection searches forces the parameter space to be even more highly constrained [61,62], requiring a highly tuned and very small Higgs portal coupling. The simplest version of this scenario is now almost, if not completely, excluded by these multiple constraints from several observations and experiments [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of the Higgs portal coupling is highly constrained by the bound on the invisible Higgs width for a general scalar, while for a DM candidate obtaining the observed relic density while also satisfying direct detection searches forces the parameter space to be even more highly constrained [61,62], requiring a highly tuned and very small Higgs portal coupling. The simplest version of this scenario is now almost, if not completely, excluded by these multiple constraints from several observations and experiments [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless there can be testable consequences of this scenario which can put constraints on its coupling and mass. These include constraints from searches of invisible decay of Higgs at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) [25][26][27], direct and indirect detections of DM as well as compliance with the observed relic density [28][29][30][31][32]. Implications for the LHC [33][34][35][36][37] and ILC [38] have also been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the DM is less dense in this region, for example as predicted by the Einasto profile [75], CTA will not be sensitive to any parameter space that is not already ruled out by direct detection experiments for the model we consider. Late time annihilations can also result in a significant rate of position production in Higgs portal models, both for DM masses above and below the threshold for production of electroweak (EW) gauge bosons [76]. As a result, measurements of the antiproton flux by AMS-02 [77] constrain the value of the portal coupling [78,79], and the bounds obtained can be comparable to those from direct detection experiments in the high DM mass region.…”
Section: Direct Indirect and Collider Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, as discussed in Section 2.1, this is obtained assuming a relatively optimistic DM spatial distribution. Future measurements of anti-protons or anti-deuterium [129] produced by DM annihilations might also be sensitive to parts of parameter space that are not currently excluded [76,130], however astrophysical backgrounds and uncertainties are likely to remain significant.…”
Section: Direct and Indirect Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%