Conspectus der „<i>Thlaspi</i>”︁‐Arten Europas, Afrikas und Vorderasiens

Meyer, Friedrich Karl

doi:10.1002/fedr.19730840503

Cited by 74 publications

(79 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Meyer, 2006 vs. Marhold, 2011), or as subspecies of any of them. Meyer (1973, 2006) accepted species status of N. brachypetala (with three subspecies) and, unlike other authors (e. g., Dvořáková, 2003) accepted only two subspecies of N. caerulescens : subsp. caerulescens and subsp.…”

Section: Taxonomic History Biogeography and Systematics Of Arabidopsmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…Much later, Meyer (1973, 1979) revised the generic concept based mostly on seed coat anatomy and embryology, and placed many of the former Thlaspi species into a well-defined genus Noccaea . As indicated by the authority Moench, Meyer was not the first who recognized this genus, but Moench did so in (1802) by recognition of the species, previously known as Iberis rotundifolia L. or Lepidium rotundifolium (L.) All.…”

Section: Taxonomic History Biogeography and Systematics Of Arabidopsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Based on morphological and particularly anatomical characters, Meyer (1973, 1979) (correctly) recognized Noccaea as the well-defined group. Twenty years later, molecular evidence which confirmed this finding from a phylogenetic point of view was published (Mummenhoff and Koch, 1994; Zunk et al, 1996).…”

Section: Taxonomic History Biogeography and Systematics Of Arabidopsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The above mentioned discrepancies along with the fact that Meyer's (1973, 1979, 2006) circumscription of Noccaea , including the recognition of two subspecies of N. caerulescens and his generic concept has not been followed in recent floristic treatments in Europe, it is difficult to unravel putative distribution ranges and occurrence of the various taxa. For example, Meyer does not confirm previous reports of N. caerulescens for Spain (e.g., Clapham and Akeroyd, 1993; Pujados Salvá, 1993 as Thlaspi ).…”

Section: Taxonomic History Biogeography and Systematics Of Arabidopsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Taxonomy and systematics are key to biological information: Arabidopsis, Eutrema (Thellungiella), Noccaea and Schrenkiella (Brassicaceae) as examples

Koch¹,

German²

2013

Front. Plant Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Taxonomy and systematics provide the names and evolutionary framework for any biological study. Without these names there is no access to a biological context of the evolutionary processes which gave rise to a given taxon: close relatives and sister species (hybridization), more distantly related taxa (ancestral states), for example. This is not only true for the single species a research project is focusing on, but also for its relatives, which might be selected for comparative approaches and future research. Nevertheless, taxonomical and systematic knowledge is rarely fully explored and considered across biological disciplines. One would expect the situation to be more developed with model organisms such as Noccaea, Arabidopsis, Schrenkiella and Eutrema (Thellungiella). However, we show the reverse. Using Arabidopsis halleri and Noccaea caerulescens, two model species among metal accumulating taxa, we summarize and reflect past taxonomy and systematics of Arabidopsis and Noccaea and provide a modern synthesis of taxonomic, systematic and evolutionary perspectives. The same is presented for several species of Eutrema s. l. and Schrenkiella recently appeared as models for studying stress tolerance in plants and widely known under the name Thellungiella.

show abstract

Section: Taxonomic History Biogeography and Systematics Of Arabidopsmentioning

confidence: 92%

Section: Taxonomic History Biogeography and Systematics Of Arabidopsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Taxonomic History Biogeography and Systematics Of Arabidopsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Taxonomic History Biogeography and Systematics Of Arabidopsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Taxonomy and systematics are key to biological information: Arabidopsis, Eutrema (Thellungiella), Noccaea and Schrenkiella (Brassicaceae) as examples

Koch¹,

German²

2013

Front. Plant Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A new classiication of Thlaspi L. was proposed four decades ago (Meyer 1973(Meyer , 1979, recognizing the genera Microthlaspi F. K. Mey., Noccaea Moench and Thlaspi for species of Thlaspi s.l.…”

Section: Brassicaceae (M a Koch)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German flora monophyletic?

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The use of DNA sequence data in plant systematics has brought us closer than ever to formulating wellfounded hypotheses about phylogenetic relationships, and phylogenetic research keeps on revealing that plant genera as traditionally circumscribed often are not monophyletic. Here, we assess the monophyly of all genera of vascular plants found in Germany. Using a survey of the phylogenetic literature, we discuss which classiications would be consistent with the phylogenetic relationships found and could be followed, provided monophyly is accepted as the primary criterion for circumscribing taxa. We indicate whether and which names are available when changes in generic assignment are made (but do not present a comprehensive review of the nomenclatural aspects of such names). Among the 840 genera examined, we identiied c. 140 where data quality is suiciently high to conclude that they are not monophyletic, and an additional c. 20 where monophyly is questionable but where data quality is not yet suicient to reach convincing conclusions. While it is still iercely debated how a phylogenetic tree should be translated into a classiication, our results could serve as a guide to the likely consequences of systematic research for the taxonomy of the German lora and the loras of neighbouring countries.

show abstract

Kritische Revision der „Thlaspi”︁‐Arten Europas, Afrikas und Vorderasiens I. Geschichte, Morphologie und Chorologie

Meyer

1979

Feddes Repertorium

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In der allgemeinen Einleitung einer in mehreren Teilen erscheinenden systematischen Bearbeitung der bisher in der Gattung Thlaspi L. geführten Arten aus Europa, Vorderasien und Afrika wird nach bereits erfolgter Veröffentlichung eines Conspectus dieser Arten ein historischer Überblick über die Gattung Thlaspi gegeben und morphologische bzw. anatomische Merkmale einer Wertung unterzogen. Als wertvoll erwies sich u. a. die Struktur der Samentesta, die bei Thlaspi s. str. einen eigenen Charakter zeigt und sich von allen anderen bisherigen Thlaspi‐Arten unterscheidet. Dadurch erweisen sich die zu Thlaspi s. str. gehörigen Arten als eigener Komplex, von dem sich die anderen bisherigen Thlaspi‐Arten deutlich unterscheiden. Die charakteristischen Unterschiede der außerhalb dieses Thlaspi‐Komplexes stehenden zahlreichen Arten erlauben wiederum eine stärkere Gattungsdifferenzierung, daß sich die bisherige Gattung Thlaspi als Mosaik verschiedener Gattungen zeigt, deren engerer oder weiterer systematischer Verwandtschaftsgrad sich erst nach umfassenderen Studien innerhalb verschiedenster Gattungen der Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) feststellen lassen wird. Eine Subordinierung dieser Verwandtschaftskreise als „Untergattungen”︁ von Thlaspi ist nicht möglich, da der morphologisch‐anatomische Abstand zu groß ist. Ein Verharren auf dem bisherigen Umfang einer heterogenen Gattung Thlaspi würde einer Zusammenfassung vieler anderer bisher gut unterschiedener Gattungen in der Familie der Brassicaceae Vorschub leisten und nicht die natürlichen Verhältnisse widerspiegeln. Beigegebene Abbildungen von Früchten und Samentesten verschiedener Arten sollen diese Ansicht untermauern. Abschließend wird die geographische Verbreitung der einzelnen Gattungen dargestellt, die bei Noccaea Moench auch kurz deren weite Verbreitung durch Nordasien und das extratropische Amerika streift.

show abstract

Conspectus der „Thlaspi”︁‐Arten Europas, Afrikas und Vorderasiens

Cited by 74 publications

References 5 publications

Taxonomy and systematics are key to biological information: Arabidopsis, Eutrema (Thellungiella), Noccaea and Schrenkiella (Brassicaceae) as examples

Taxonomy and systematics are key to biological information: Arabidopsis, Eutrema (Thellungiella), Noccaea and Schrenkiella (Brassicaceae) as examples

Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German flora monophyletic?

Kritische Revision der „Thlaspi”︁‐Arten Europas, Afrikas und Vorderasiens I. Geschichte, Morphologie und Chorologie

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About