2015
DOI: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.013-015.ebo
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CONSORT: when and how to use it

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, a variety of extensions exist making the CONSORT guidelines applicable for a variety of research designs. Though the guidelines are not intended to assess studies' quality (Schulz et al, 2010), they have been previously proven useful in assessing quality of studies (Falci & Marques, 2015).…”
Section: Relevance the Journal Of Consulting And Clinical Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, a variety of extensions exist making the CONSORT guidelines applicable for a variety of research designs. Though the guidelines are not intended to assess studies' quality (Schulz et al, 2010), they have been previously proven useful in assessing quality of studies (Falci & Marques, 2015).…”
Section: Relevance the Journal Of Consulting And Clinical Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viral culture technique should be employed in future in vivo research so as to establish the true potential of viral infectivity. In addition, guidelines to conduct in vitro studies, e.g., Preferred Reporting Items for Laboratory studies in Endodontology (PRILE), and clinical trials, e.g., Preferred Reporting Items for Randomized Trials in Endodontics (PRIRATE) or Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT), should be followed (66)(67)(68).…”
Section: Future Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary studies included in the final analysis will be appraised for quality using CONSORT 15 (randomized), STROBE 16 (observational), QUADAS-2 (DTA) studies, 17 and against the criteria in the CARNet white paper for studies of dCA. 2 Two centers will independently appraise studies and a third center will mediate disagreements in quality assessment.…”
Section: Primary Study Quality and Risk Of Bias Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%