Considering adaptive genetic variation in climate change vulnerability assessment reduces species range loss projections

Abstract

Local adaptations can determine the potential of populations to respond to environmental changes, yet adaptive genetic variation is commonly ignored in models forecasting species vulnerability and biogeographical shifts under future climate change. Here we integrate genomic and ecological modeling approaches to identify genetic adaptations associated with climate in two cryptic forest bats. We then incorporate this information directly into forecasts of range changes under future climate change and assessment of population persistence through the spread of climate-adaptive genetic variation (evolutionary rescue potential). Considering climate-adaptive potential reduced range loss projections, suggesting that failure to account for intraspecific variability can result in overestimation of future losses. On the other hand, range overlap between species was projected to increase, indicating that interspecific competition is likely to play an important role in limiting species’ future ranges. We show that although evolutionary rescue is possible, it depends on a population’s adaptive capacity and connectivity. Hence, we stress the importance of incorporating genomic data and landscape connectivity in climate change vulnerability assessments and conservation management.

Evolution is a double‐edged sword, not a silver bullet, to confront global change

“…Similarly, in forest bats ( Myotis spp. ), projected losses in range size were limited when adaptive evolution was incorporated into species distribution models 106 . However, there are exceptions to diminished vulnerability.…”

Genomic assessment of local adaptation in dwarf birch to inform assisted gene flow

“…ENMs project the distribution of 120 species' ranges under current and future climate scenarios based on observation data and can 121 guide effective sampling (Elith and Leathwick, 2009). ENMs are also an established tool for 122 conservation practitioners seeking to understand major climatic selection pressures and 123 projected range shifts for threatened species, but often lack integration and comparison with 124 genomic assays of local adaptation (Hällfors et al, 2015;Razgour et al, 2019). 125…”

Plant adaptation to climate change—Where are we?

“…Novel climatic conditions could impose strong selection on natural populations (Bemmels & Anderson, 2019;Exposito-Alonso et al, 2019;Fu et al, 2019). Populations risk declines if they do not have enough genetic variation to adapt to these new pressures and if immigration is insufficient to introduce alleles adapted to warmer conditions in lower latitude or elevation sites (Carlson et al, 2014;Bemmels & Anderson, 2019;Carja & Plotkin, 2019;Kelly, 2019;Razgour et al, 2019). In addition, genetic tradeoffs across traits could constrain adaptive evolution, even under high quantitative genetic variation in functional traits (Etterson & Shaw, 2001).…”