2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment for Repair of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Acute Dislocations of the Patella

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
143
0
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
143
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…16 In contrast, a prospective nonrandomized Level II study of 76 patients comparing nonoperative treatment with acute primary repair did not show differences in patellar instability after a median 7-year follow-up. 17 The following year, however, the same group published a prospective randomized Level I study of 40 young adults comparing nonoperative treatment with surgical stabilization, including both primary repairs and some reconstructions, showing lower rates of recurrent instability after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…16 In contrast, a prospective nonrandomized Level II study of 76 patients comparing nonoperative treatment with acute primary repair did not show differences in patellar instability after a median 7-year follow-up. 17 The following year, however, the same group published a prospective randomized Level I study of 40 young adults comparing nonoperative treatment with surgical stabilization, including both primary repairs and some reconstructions, showing lower rates of recurrent instability after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…While some studies recommend surgical treatment after the first patellar dislocation, some recommend conservative treatment (15)(16)(17). Because the evidence in the literature is unsatisfying, no optimal treatment choice is available for this issue (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what concerns to the action taken towards the MPFL, arguments for conservative treatment are: this was the first episode of an APD [13]; there were no anatomic variations, nor hyperlaxity criteria (MPFL rupture is not the cause, but a consequence of an APD). The arguments for surgical treatment, whether repair or reconstruction, are: since a medial arthrotomy was used, a MPFL repair would be a reasonable procedure; some prospective studies begin to show better long term results for MPFL reconstruction, compared to those observed with conservative treatment [14]. As our knowledge about the biomechanical importance of the MPFL evolves -mainly its role against lateral displacement during motion and under high lateral stresses [15] -the more orthopaedic surgeons consider MPFL reconstruction the mainstay of treatment, even in the context of a primary APD [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%