Conseqüências do uso da mamadeira para o desenvolvimento orofacial em crianças inicialmente amamentadas ao peito

Carrascoza, Karina Camillo; Possobon, Rosana de Fátima; Tomita, Laura Mendes; Moraes, Antônio Bento Alves de

doi:10.1590/s0021-75572006000600015

Cited by 33 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 7 publications

(8 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Nevertheless, our results support the recommendation of cup feeding when the newborn needs an alternative feeding method, as it provides the infant with an opportunity for developing the muscles involved in suction [9,32]. The positive impact of cup feeding has also been reported in studies where there is a higher prevalence of breastfeeding after hospital discharge in infants who used the cup for supplementation in neonatal units [17,32,34]. …”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

“…This increased activity of the buccinator muscle reduces jaw movements, promotes tongue retraction and increases the chances of tongue hypoactivity or hyperactivity, depending on the type of suction performed [9,18]. This could affect the development of the masticatory function, and lead to possible chewing and swallowing disorders [7,8,19,27,34]. …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Electromyographic analysis of masseter muscle in newborns during suction in breast, bottle or cup feeding

França

Sousa

Aragão

et al. 2014

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundWhen breastfeeding is difficult or impossible during the neonatal period, an analysis of muscle activity can help determine the best method for substituting it to promote the child’s development. The aim of this study was to analyze the electrical activity of the masseter muscle using surface electromyography during suction in term newborns by comparing breastfeeding, bottle and cup feeding.MethodsAn observational, cross-sectional analytical study was carried out on healthy, clinically stable term infants, assigned to receive either breast, or bottle or cup feeding. Setting was a Baby Friendly accredited hospital. Muscle activity was analyzed when each infant showed interest in sucking using surface electromyography. Root mean square averages (RMS) recorded in microvolts were transformed into percentages (normalization) of the reference value. The three groups were compared by ANOVA; the “stepwise” method of the multiple linear regression analysis tested the model which best defined the activity of the masseter muscle in the sample at a significance level of 5%.ResultsParticipants were 81 full term newborns (27 per group), from 2 to 28 days of life. RMS values were lower for bottle (mean 44.2%, SD 14.1) than breast feeding (mean 58.3%, SD 12.7) (P = 0.003, ANOVA); cup feeding (52.5%, SD 18.2%) was not significantly different (P > 0.05). For every gram of weight increase, RMS increased by 0.010 units.ConclusionsMasseter activity was significantly higher in breastfed newborns than in bottle-fed newborns, who presented the lowest RMS values. Levels of masseter activity during cup-feeding were between those of breast and bottle feeding, and did not significantly differ from either group. This study in healthy full term neonates endorses cup rather than bottle feeding as a temporary substitute for breastfeeding.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electromyographic analysis of masseter muscle in newborns during suction in breast, bottle or cup feeding

França

Sousa

Aragão

et al. 2014

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Pacifier sucking, baby bottle sucking and especially finger sucking frequently causes protrusion of the upper incisors and the premaxilla, atypical swallowing 6 7 , anterior open bite and posterior crossbite 8 - 10 . The posterior crossbite is due to a low position of the tongue due to sucking, with lack of thrust of the tongue on the palate and increased activity of the muscles of the cheeks that causes an alteration of muscle pressure on the upper arch 11 - 12 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica

Grippaudo

Paolantonio

Antonini

et al. 2016

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital

106

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Il rapporto fra abitudini viziate, respirazione orale e malocclusione è fondamentale in tema di prevenzione e trattamento precoce dei disturbi della crescita cranio-facciale. Infatti così come le abitudini viziate possono interferire negativamente con la posizione dei denti e con il normale pattern di crescita scheletrica cranio-facciale, così lostruzione delle vie aeree superiori, con conseguente respirazione orale, cambia il modello di crescita craniofacciale con sviluppo di malocclusioni da moderate a severe. Questo studio trasversale, effettuato su 3.017 bambini applicando il ROMA index, vuole verificare lesistenza di una correlazione significativa tra abitudini viziate/respirazione orale e malocclusione. Dai risultati emerge che allaumentare del grado dellindice aumenta anche la prevalenza di abitudini viziate e respirazione orale, significando che questi fattori sono associati alle malocclusioni più gravi. Inoltre abbiamo riscontrato unassociazione statisticamente significativa fra abitudini viziate e overjet e openbite aumentati, ma non con il morso inverso. Dal lavoro è emerso che la respirazione orale è strettamente correlata ad overjet aumentato, overjet inverso, morso crociato, openbite e displacement. Riteniamo quindi che abitudini viziate e respirazione orale, rientrando fra i fattori di rischio di malocclusione, vadano intercettati e corretti precocemente per prevenire lo sviluppo di malocclusioni o il peggioramento di quelle preesistenti.

show abstract

“…When performed correctly, it also plays a role in the development of the maxilla and mandible and contributed, together with genetic and environmental factors, to the stability of dental occlusion and functional and muscle balance. Whereas sucking at the breast has a favorable effect on masticatory function [5,7-9], other forms of sucking, such as those involved in bottle-feeding and pacifier use, produce different functional stimuli, which may jeopardize oral motor development and the position and strength of stomatognathic structures, with a detrimental impact on oral functions, including mastication [1,6,9,10]. …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of the duration of breastfeeding on quality of muscle function during mastication in preschoolers: a cohort study

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThere is some evidence of the benefits of breastfeeding to masticatory function, but no studies have evaluated the influence of breastfeeding duration on the quality of this function. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between duration of breastfeeding and quality of masticatory function in preschoolers.MethodsCross-sectional study nested in a contemporary cohort of 144 randomly selected Brazilian infants. Data on sociodemographic, dietary, and sucking-related parameters were collected shortly after birth and at 7, 30, 60, 120, and 180 days of life. Masticatory function was assessed between the ages of 3 and 5 years, using a standardized procedure involving three foodstuffs of different consistencies, for evaluation of incision, lip competence, masticatory patterns, masticatory movements, and perioral muscle use. The quality of masticatory function was scored, and multiple linear regression was used to test for association between this score and the duration of breastfeeding.ResultsA positive correlation was found between duration of breastfeeding and masticatory function scores (rs = 0.473; p < 0.001). Children breastfed for at least 12 months had significantly higher average scores, regardless of bottle-feeding or pacifier use. Children who were breastfed for longer were more likely to score satisfactorily across all tested parameters.ConclusionsBreastfeeding has a positive impact on mastication. In our sample, duration of breastfeeding was positively associated with the quality of masticatory function at preschool age.

show abstract

Conseqüências do uso da mamadeira para o desenvolvimento orofacial em crianças inicialmente amamentadas ao peito

Cited by 33 publications

References 7 publications

Electromyographic analysis of masseter muscle in newborns during suction in breast, bottle or cup feeding

Electromyographic analysis of masseter muscle in newborns during suction in breast, bottle or cup feeding

Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica

Influence of the duration of breastfeeding on quality of muscle function during mastication in preschoolers: a cohort study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About