2006
DOI: 10.2223/jped.1536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Objective: To identify and assess the possible consequences of bottle-feeding on the oral facial development of children who were breastfed up to at least six months of age.Method: Two hundred and two children (4 years of age) enrolled in an early health attention program participated in the study. The sample was divided into two groups: G1 (children who used only a cup to drink) and G2 (those who used a bottle).Results: Lip closure was observed in 82% of the children in G1 and in 65% of those in G2 (p = 0.006… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
29
0
17

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
29
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…6,10,12,[16][17][18] At the same time, there is reliable evidence of a positive influence of breastfeeding on craniofacial development. [4][5][6][7]18,19 Breastfeeding promotes intense exercise of the orofacial muscles, thus favorably stimulating nose breathing, proper swallowing, chewing and phonation. 4,5,19 Bottle-feeding, however, involves a different type of nipple and therefore a quite distinct Graph 2 -Sample distribution according to the age of bottle-feeding persistence in the study groups by age of pacifier use persistence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,10,12,[16][17][18] At the same time, there is reliable evidence of a positive influence of breastfeeding on craniofacial development. [4][5][6][7]18,19 Breastfeeding promotes intense exercise of the orofacial muscles, thus favorably stimulating nose breathing, proper swallowing, chewing and phonation. 4,5,19 Bottle-feeding, however, involves a different type of nipple and therefore a quite distinct Graph 2 -Sample distribution according to the age of bottle-feeding persistence in the study groups by age of pacifier use persistence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 In addition, the use of artificial nipples (bottles and pacifiers) are not recommended, since it reduces suckling duration, which, in turn, causes an interference in the demand for food 3 along with an alteration in the oral and myofunctional dynamics. [3][4][5][6][7] A direct relationship between short breastfeeding duration and increased prevalence of non-nutritive sucking habits, especially pacifier use, has been reported. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] However, a possible association between breast-or bottle-feeding durations and the age of persistence of pacifier-sucking habits is not completely elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essa altera-ção radical pode ser explicada principalmente pelas altas taxas de aleitamento materno até a Visita 4 que não permitiam o aparecimento do uso da mamadeira como um fator de risco importante. Comparando crianças amamentadas que utilizavam copo e mamadeira, Carrascoza et al 21 concluíram que o uso de mamadeira, mesmo entre crianças que receberam aleitamento materno, interfere negativamente sobre o desenvolvimento orofacial, no que se refere à perda do selamento labial, repouso da língua no arco superior e formato maxilar anormal.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The basic practices that are necessary to support mothers were summarized in the "Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding", one of which is "give no artificial teats or pacifiers" (5) . Use of artificial teats (pacifiers and bottles) have also been blamed for craniofacial developmental problems leading to mouth breathing, dental deformities, greater predisposition to airway infections, problems with phonation, dentition, mastication and deglutition, all of which are prejudicial to children's health (6,7) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%