2005
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensual qualitative research: An update.

Abstract: The authors reviewed the application of consensual qualitative research (CQR) in 27 studies published since the method's introduction to the field in 1997 by C. E. Hill, B. J. Thompson, and E. N. Williams (1997). After first describing the core components and the philosophical underpinnings of CQR, the authors examined how it has been applied in terms of the consensus process, biases, research teams, data collection, data analysis, and writing up the results and discussion sections of articles. On the basis of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
2,981
1
45

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,220 publications
(3,040 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
13
2,981
1
45
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the size of the final sample is consistent with CQR methodology guidelines (Hill et al, 2005(Hill et al, , 1997, it is possible that those supervisees who chose not to participate in this study would have responded differently. Another limitation is that these results are based on supervisees' recall of such events, and it is possible that our participants' memory was faulty or distorted.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the size of the final sample is consistent with CQR methodology guidelines (Hill et al, 2005(Hill et al, , 1997, it is possible that those supervisees who chose not to participate in this study would have responded differently. Another limitation is that these results are based on supervisees' recall of such events, and it is possible that our participants' memory was faulty or distorted.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, CQR affords the researcher an opportunity to understand the inner experiences of participants, providing a more complete description of the phenomenon under investigation. Additionally, CQR has been used in numerous studies on the process of psychotherapy (Hill et al, 2005) and is a robust methodology for illuminating interpersonal processes such as crosscultural supervision.To explore the phenomenon of cultural responsiveness and unresponsiveness in cross-cultural supervision, we studied EASEs' experiences in supervision with a supervisor of color and SECs' experiences in supervision with a European American supervisor. To provide a context for specific culturally responsive and unresponsive events, we first queried participants about their overall experiences of cultural discussions in supervision.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Informed by recommendations given by Hill, Knox, Thompson, Williams, Hess and Ladany (2005) we used an independent auditor (JM) to review our understanding of the material and to minimize potential groupthink. The research group met on a regular basis to share their interpretations of specific aspects of the case, to explore the possibility of arriving at a consensus reading, and to agree on further topics for analysis in the next cycle of the inquiry process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conducting an iterative Consensual Qualitative Research (CQR) process (Hill et al, 2005), two authors (FHN and MTG) first inductively coded responses and then grouped these into themes with the objective of supplementing the survey's quantitative responses (deductive coding). This mixed method of qualitative and quantitative questions was used in order to clarify results and reasons for potential contradictions, in a complementary and pragmatic approach (Hall, 2013).…”
Section: (B) Review Of Eight Adhd Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%