2017
DOI: 10.3390/insects8020052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connecting the Dots: From an Easy Method to Computerized Species Determination

Abstract: Differences in growth rate of forensically important dipteran larvae make species determination an essential requisite for an accurate estimation of time since colonization of the body. Interspecific morphological similarities, however, complicate species determination. Muscle attachment site (MAS) patterns on the inside of the cuticula of fly larvae are species specific and grow proportionally with the animal. The patterns can therefore be used for species identification, as well as age estimation in forensic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification of fruit fly adult species based on machine vision [ 43 ] or the method of identifying and counting other insects [ 44 , 45 , 46 ] is mature and has practical applications. At present, using the popular deep learning object detection algorithm, as yolo [ 47 , 48 ] and maskRCNN [ 49 , 50 ] identification can also achieve better results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of fruit fly adult species based on machine vision [ 43 ] or the method of identifying and counting other insects [ 44 , 45 , 46 ] is mature and has practical applications. At present, using the popular deep learning object detection algorithm, as yolo [ 47 , 48 ] and maskRCNN [ 49 , 50 ] identification can also achieve better results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For further improvement of the MAS method for species determination in dipteran larvae, the first steps into computerization were conducted in a previous study 28 . This approach will reduce researcher bias and facilitate the method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%