2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional Survival After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
62
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(47 reference statements)
8
62
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3,17,18,21,42 Data from the current study similarly noted that the most important gains in survival estimates were among patients with aggressive disease. In particular, patients with worse prognostic features had a higher increase in CDFS based on actual time survived (Table 3 and Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…3,17,18,21,42 Data from the current study similarly noted that the most important gains in survival estimates were among patients with aggressive disease. In particular, patients with worse prognostic features had a higher increase in CDFS based on actual time survived (Table 3 and Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The risk of recurrence and death evolves during the followup period after surgery [80]. Stringent follow-up (Table 5) is mandatory to detect metachronous bladder tumours, local recurrence, and distant metastases.…”
Section: Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-years cDFS relative to each timepoint was then obtained by dividing the survival rate at each of the 24 + timepoints months by the survival rate at the baseline timepoints. In other words, cDFS (2y|timepoint)=S(timepoint+24)/S(timepoint) according to previous studies [8] [9] [10]. Comparison of changes in cDFS was further performed after stratification according to the most clinically relevant variables at univariate analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%