2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352008000400037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concordância entre duas técnicas coproparasitológicas para diagnóstico de Fasciola hepatica em bovinos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protocol was implemented by using the FreeCalc software version 2 [(c) Copyright 2001-Angus Cameron AusVet Animal Health Services]. The sensitivity (92.7 %) and specificity (94.9 %) of the Flukefinder ® [ 26 ], 40 % minimum expected prevalence and cattle population interval of 1–250 animals were included as parameters. A maximum of 13 animals are required to be sampled in each household.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol was implemented by using the FreeCalc software version 2 [(c) Copyright 2001-Angus Cameron AusVet Animal Health Services]. The sensitivity (92.7 %) and specificity (94.9 %) of the Flukefinder ® [ 26 ], 40 % minimum expected prevalence and cattle population interval of 1–250 animals were included as parameters. A maximum of 13 animals are required to be sampled in each household.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Other coprological methods that hold promise as an alternative for Kato-Katz are the recently developed Mini-FLOTAC and Flukefinder test. Both methods have proven to have a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of fascioliasis in livestock, 1517 but they have not yet been fully validated for the diagnosis of human fascioliasis. In this study, we compared the diagnostic performance of the standard method (Kato-Katz) with the recently developed methods Mini-FLOTAC and Flukefinder for the detection and quantification of F. hepatica eggs in human stool samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kato-Katz thick smear (SterliTech, Kent, WA), 17 Flukefinder (Flukefinder, Soda Springs, ID), 16 and Mini-FLOTAC (Zinc Chloride flotation solution with a specific gravity of 1.30; University of Naples, Naples, Italy) 14 methods were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The fecal egg counts (FECs; expressed in epg) were obtained by multiplying the egg counts by 24 for Kato-Katz (0.417 g of stool is examined), 10 for Mini-FLOTAC (0.1 g of stool is examined = 2 mL of stool suspension which contains 2 g in a total volume 40 mL), and 0.5 for Flukefinder (2 g of stool is examined).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors compared the use of the Girão and Ueno [1], technique with a processing technique involving sequential filtration through two sieves of a Fluke finder unit and found similar results for the diagnosis of F. hepatica infection in cattle, but they advocate the use of the first technique because the materials for fabricating the Flukefinder device are imported, which limits the applicability of the test [12]. In the performance of the present study, the sedimentation technique described by Foreyt [2], was less costly than the Girão and Ueno [1], technique in addition to providing a higher percentage of egg retrieval.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the applicability must be taken into consideration in an attempt to reduce the costs and the time spent in preparing the tests without affecting the quality of the results [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%