Partnerships for Sustainability in Contemporary Global Governance 2022
DOI: 10.4324/9781003148371-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conclusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, Le Pennec and Raufflet (2018) argue that existing partnership studies “tend to underspecify the definition and types of value” they seek to create externally (p. 818). Recent research identifies the extent to which partnerships may actually deliver less than they promise, or even disrupt certain types of value created as they emphasize others (Andonova & Faul, 2022). Thus, in addition to examining value created for partners and partnerships (internal), partnership researchers urge researchers to analyze the social value created by partnerships (externally), particularly value created for beneficiaries as examined in the study we report (Austin & Seitanidi, 2012b; Le Ber & Branzei, 2010b; Trujillo, 2018; Vestergaard et al, 2020, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Le Pennec and Raufflet (2018) argue that existing partnership studies “tend to underspecify the definition and types of value” they seek to create externally (p. 818). Recent research identifies the extent to which partnerships may actually deliver less than they promise, or even disrupt certain types of value created as they emphasize others (Andonova & Faul, 2022). Thus, in addition to examining value created for partners and partnerships (internal), partnership researchers urge researchers to analyze the social value created by partnerships (externally), particularly value created for beneficiaries as examined in the study we report (Austin & Seitanidi, 2012b; Le Ber & Branzei, 2010b; Trujillo, 2018; Vestergaard et al, 2020, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%