2009
DOI: 10.1080/09500690902974207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual Coherence Revealed in Multi‐Modal Representations of Astronomy Knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, in general, there was consistency of dynamic concepts within and across media and their associated modalities in keeping with the theory of conceptual coherence (see Blown and Bryce 2010), there was substantial evidence of children using both everyday and scientific language. There was also evidence of language mode switching from embedded to 7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, in general, there was consistency of dynamic concepts within and across media and their associated modalities in keeping with the theory of conceptual coherence (see Blown and Bryce 2010), there was substantial evidence of children using both everyday and scientific language. There was also evidence of language mode switching from embedded to 7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Gelder (1998) has even gone as far as to dispense with the idea of representation entirely in his consideration of the relationships between skill and knowledge. We have not resorted to this in our own previous work on the coherence of conceptions (see, for example, Blown and Bryce (2010) where we have assessed young people's understandings via different modalities-talking, drawing and play-dough modelling), but we have certainly demonstrated conceptual coherence in children's thinking compatible with both a representational connotation and a cognitive skill interpretation of concepts. We found no evidence in support of the counter-theory of knowledge-in-pieces proposed by diSessa (1988,2008) and advocated by Nobes et al (2003).…”
Section: Neuroscience and Recent Ideas In Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the modal representations make learning scientific concepts easier (Ainsworth, 2008). Using modal representations enables the students to indicate the concepts they learn in different ways (Waldrip, Prain & Carolan, 2006;Blown & Bryce, 2010), think what they learn and be able to review within a scientific process (Mayer, 2003;Schnotz & Bannert, 2003). Using modal representations is understood from the use of the modal representations by the students in the experimental group more frequently and variously when compared to the students in the control group in their writings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%